The EU’s Digital Markets Act represents an ambitious attempt to curtail Big Techs’ market and infrastructural power by imposing significant new ex ante regulatory obligations on the largest digital platforms or ‘gatekeepers’. The EU requirements are designed to constrain Big Techs’ ability to exploit economies of scale and network effects to the detriment of market competition and consumer protection. Although the DMA does not regulate platform financial services directly, EU financial regulators and EU financial institutions were amongst the most vocal and influential supporters of the EU’s new digital regulatory agenda. How can we explain this? Drawing on theories of business power, we argue that financial actors leveraged their influence through ‘noisy geopolitics’ by expanding the breadth of the anti-Big Tech coalition and reframing their preferences around the EU’s emergent digital sovereignty agenda. In contrast, the coalition of (predominantly) US Big Techs and US officials increasingly fragmented in the face of mounting political opposition at home and the failure to find wider business allies in Europe.

Scott, J., Quaglia, L. (2025). Banks and the noisy geopolitics of big tech regulation in Europe. COMPETITION & CHANGE, Online First(Special Issue: Transformation of Banking), 1-19 [10.1177/10245294251327729].

Banks and the noisy geopolitics of big tech regulation in Europe

Scott James;Lucia Quaglia
2025

Abstract

The EU’s Digital Markets Act represents an ambitious attempt to curtail Big Techs’ market and infrastructural power by imposing significant new ex ante regulatory obligations on the largest digital platforms or ‘gatekeepers’. The EU requirements are designed to constrain Big Techs’ ability to exploit economies of scale and network effects to the detriment of market competition and consumer protection. Although the DMA does not regulate platform financial services directly, EU financial regulators and EU financial institutions were amongst the most vocal and influential supporters of the EU’s new digital regulatory agenda. How can we explain this? Drawing on theories of business power, we argue that financial actors leveraged their influence through ‘noisy geopolitics’ by expanding the breadth of the anti-Big Tech coalition and reframing their preferences around the EU’s emergent digital sovereignty agenda. In contrast, the coalition of (predominantly) US Big Techs and US officials increasingly fragmented in the face of mounting political opposition at home and the failure to find wider business allies in Europe.
2025
Scott, J., Quaglia, L. (2025). Banks and the noisy geopolitics of big tech regulation in Europe. COMPETITION & CHANGE, Online First(Special Issue: Transformation of Banking), 1-19 [10.1177/10245294251327729].
Scott, James; Quaglia, Lucia
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Banks and the noisy geopolitics of big tech regulation in Europe.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Postprint / Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM) - versione accettata per la pubblicazione dopo la peer-review
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 456.13 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
456.13 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1026580
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact