Radiomics of cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has proved to be potentially useful in the study of various myocardial diseases. Therefore, assessing the repeatability degree in radiomic features measurement is of fundamental importance. The aim of this study was to assess test-retest repeatability of myocardial radiomic features extracted from quantitative T1 and T2 maps. A representative group of 24 subjects (mean age 54 ± 18 years) referred for clinical cardiac MR imaging were enrolled in the study. For each subject, T1 and T2 mapping through MOLLI and T2-prepared TrueFISP acquisition sequences, respectively, were performed at 1.5 T. Then, 98 radiomic features of different classes (shape, first-order, second-order) were extracted from a region of interest encompassing the whole left ventricle myocardium in a short axis slice. The repeatability was assessed performing different and complementary analyses: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LOA) (i.e., the interval within which 95% of the percentage differences between two repeated measures are expected to lie). Radiomic features were characterized by a relatively wide range of repeatability degree in terms of both ICC and LOA. Overall, 44.9% and 38.8% of radiomic features showed ICC values > 0.75 for T1 and T2 maps, respectively, while 25.5% and 23.4% of radiomic features showed LOA between ±10%. A subset of radiomic features for T1 (Mean, Median, 10Percentile, 90Percentile, RootMeanSquared, Imc2, RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized, RunPercentage and ShortRunEmphasis) and T2 (MaximumDiameter, RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized, RunPercentage, ShortRunEmphasis) maps presented both ICC > 0.75 and LOA between ±5%. Overall, radiomic features extracted from T1 maps showed better repeatability performance than those extracted from T2 maps, with shape features characterized by better repeatability than first-order and textural features. Moreover, only a limited subset of 9 and 4 radiomic features for T1 and T2 maps, respectively, showed high repeatability degree in terms of both ICC and LOA. These results confirm the importance of assessing test-retest repeatability degree in radiomic feature estimation and might be useful for a more effective/reliable use of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping radiomics in clinical or research studies.

Marfisi, D., Giannelli, M., Marzi, C., Del Meglio, J., Barucci, A., Masturzo, L., et al. (2024). Test-retest repeatability of myocardial radiomic features from quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance T1 and T2 mapping. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 113, 1-10 [10.1016/j.mri.2024.110217].

Test-retest repeatability of myocardial radiomic features from quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance T1 and T2 mapping

Diciotti S.
Penultimo
;
2024

Abstract

Radiomics of cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has proved to be potentially useful in the study of various myocardial diseases. Therefore, assessing the repeatability degree in radiomic features measurement is of fundamental importance. The aim of this study was to assess test-retest repeatability of myocardial radiomic features extracted from quantitative T1 and T2 maps. A representative group of 24 subjects (mean age 54 ± 18 years) referred for clinical cardiac MR imaging were enrolled in the study. For each subject, T1 and T2 mapping through MOLLI and T2-prepared TrueFISP acquisition sequences, respectively, were performed at 1.5 T. Then, 98 radiomic features of different classes (shape, first-order, second-order) were extracted from a region of interest encompassing the whole left ventricle myocardium in a short axis slice. The repeatability was assessed performing different and complementary analyses: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LOA) (i.e., the interval within which 95% of the percentage differences between two repeated measures are expected to lie). Radiomic features were characterized by a relatively wide range of repeatability degree in terms of both ICC and LOA. Overall, 44.9% and 38.8% of radiomic features showed ICC values > 0.75 for T1 and T2 maps, respectively, while 25.5% and 23.4% of radiomic features showed LOA between ±10%. A subset of radiomic features for T1 (Mean, Median, 10Percentile, 90Percentile, RootMeanSquared, Imc2, RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized, RunPercentage and ShortRunEmphasis) and T2 (MaximumDiameter, RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized, RunPercentage, ShortRunEmphasis) maps presented both ICC > 0.75 and LOA between ±5%. Overall, radiomic features extracted from T1 maps showed better repeatability performance than those extracted from T2 maps, with shape features characterized by better repeatability than first-order and textural features. Moreover, only a limited subset of 9 and 4 radiomic features for T1 and T2 maps, respectively, showed high repeatability degree in terms of both ICC and LOA. These results confirm the importance of assessing test-retest repeatability degree in radiomic feature estimation and might be useful for a more effective/reliable use of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping radiomics in clinical or research studies.
2024
Marfisi, D., Giannelli, M., Marzi, C., Del Meglio, J., Barucci, A., Masturzo, L., et al. (2024). Test-retest repeatability of myocardial radiomic features from quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance T1 and T2 mapping. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 113, 1-10 [10.1016/j.mri.2024.110217].
Marfisi, D.; Giannelli, M.; Marzi, C.; Del Meglio, J.; Barucci, A.; Masturzo, L.; Vignali, C.; Mascalchi, M.; Traino, A.; Casolo, G.; Diciotti, S.; Te...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MAGRESIMAGING-D-24-00168_R1 - xStefano.pdf

embargo fino al 05/08/2025

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 671.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
671.42 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1013349
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact