Enzymes perform their catalytic action according to mechanisms featuring exquisite specificity, up to the selection of substrate conformers. However, regardless of this high specificity enzymes are able to deal with a repertoire of substrates, whose conversion into reaction products can occur with markedly different rates. Among the factors affecting the velocity of enzyme-catalyzed reactions, the presence in the substrate of an electrostatic charge could be of importance. Here we report on the kinetic parameters of four enzymes (bovine carbonic anhydrase and a-chymotrypsin, Escherichia coli (3-galactosidase, and sweet almond (3-glucosidase) determined using a NO2-containing charged substrate or its neutral counterpart. Remarkably, all the considered enzymes were found more effective when exposed to the charged substrates, featuring Km and kcat values respectively lower and higher than those determined using the neutral substrates. Furthermore, by means of ultrafiltration experiments we detected the binding of o-nitrophenyl-(3-D-galactopyranoside to a multiplicity of sites in E. coli (3-galactosidase. Overall, our observations suggest that the unspecific binding of substrate to enzyme surface aids the cycling of subsequent catalytic turnovers.

Stefan, A., Hochkoeppler, A. (2025). The catalytic action of enzymes exposed to charged substrates outperforms the activity exerted on their neutral counterparts. BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 751, 1-6 [10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151436].

The catalytic action of enzymes exposed to charged substrates outperforms the activity exerted on their neutral counterparts

Stefan A.
Primo
Investigation
;
Hochkoeppler A.
Ultimo
Conceptualization
2025

Abstract

Enzymes perform their catalytic action according to mechanisms featuring exquisite specificity, up to the selection of substrate conformers. However, regardless of this high specificity enzymes are able to deal with a repertoire of substrates, whose conversion into reaction products can occur with markedly different rates. Among the factors affecting the velocity of enzyme-catalyzed reactions, the presence in the substrate of an electrostatic charge could be of importance. Here we report on the kinetic parameters of four enzymes (bovine carbonic anhydrase and a-chymotrypsin, Escherichia coli (3-galactosidase, and sweet almond (3-glucosidase) determined using a NO2-containing charged substrate or its neutral counterpart. Remarkably, all the considered enzymes were found more effective when exposed to the charged substrates, featuring Km and kcat values respectively lower and higher than those determined using the neutral substrates. Furthermore, by means of ultrafiltration experiments we detected the binding of o-nitrophenyl-(3-D-galactopyranoside to a multiplicity of sites in E. coli (3-galactosidase. Overall, our observations suggest that the unspecific binding of substrate to enzyme surface aids the cycling of subsequent catalytic turnovers.
2025
Stefan, A., Hochkoeppler, A. (2025). The catalytic action of enzymes exposed to charged substrates outperforms the activity exerted on their neutral counterparts. BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 751, 1-6 [10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151436].
Stefan, A.; Hochkoeppler, A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
STEFANETAL-ENZYMES&SUBSTRATES.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Tersto principale
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 1.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.47 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
STEFANETAL-BBRC2025-SUPPLEMENTARYDATA.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Dati supplementari
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 1.57 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.57 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1007195
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact