Régimes de subjectivité et seuils d’intentionnalité. Résistances, interpositions et ambitions d’une forme de vie

Our goal is not to recognize the rights and wrongs of different theoretical positions concerning the subjectivity, but to understand what integration of perspectives is available and what pieces still missing in a theory of the subject in semiotics. What interests us is not the opposition between an objective person, fundamentally normalized, and a self-reflexive subject, characterized by an imperfective exploration of himself: but their syncretic treatment. In our opinion, the most important consequence of the pluralization of discursive instances is the acceptance of dualisms between forms of subjectivities which force us to manage them on different planes and without escaping a series of double binds and internal paradoxes. The notion of subject is finally the interpretant useful to understand why there is a plurality of language-games played at the same time when human collectives would invite to achieve on the contrary convergence and agreement.