The Châtelperronian and Uluzzian techno-complexes are identified in western Europe in the same stratigraphic position, between the late Middle Palaeolithic and other Upper Palaeolithic assemblages. Both industries include retouched artefacts with abrupt retouch and arched backs, and radiometric dating indicates that these two technocomplexes belong to the same window of time. Here, we provide a detailed, qualitative technological comparison of two Châtelperronian and two Uluzzian lithic assemblages based on a collaborative, first-hand examination of these collections. This study results from a one-week workshop designed to bring relevant researchers together to conduct an in-person investigation of these lithic industries. Our analysis highlights significant technological divergences between these industries. In short, the Châtelperronian is a blade industry with a minor bladelet component produced by freehand direct percussion, whereas the Uluzzian is a flake-bladelet industry with massive use of bipolar percussion and a minor component produced by freehand, direct percussion. Our results suggest that there are no, or very little, technological affinities between the Châtelperronian and the Uluzzian — despite occupying the same window of time. As an extension, this suggests that there was little to no relationship/contact between the groups producing these industries during the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition. The distinctiveness of the Châtelperronian and Uluzzian highlights that technological behaviours in western Europe during the 45–40 ka can be very diverse and that general labels such as ‘transitional industries’ are unsatisfactory in describing this diversity.

Marciani, G., Carmignani, L., Djakovic, I., Roussel, M., Arrighi, S., Rossini, M., et al. (2025). The Uluzzian and Châtelperronian: No Technological Affinity in a Shared Chronological Framework. JOURNAL OF PALEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGY, 8(1), 1-30 [10.1007/s41982-024-00202-1].

The Uluzzian and Châtelperronian: No Technological Affinity in a Shared Chronological Framework

Marciani, Giulia
Primo
;
Arrighi, Simona;Benazzi, Stefano;
2025

Abstract

The Châtelperronian and Uluzzian techno-complexes are identified in western Europe in the same stratigraphic position, between the late Middle Palaeolithic and other Upper Palaeolithic assemblages. Both industries include retouched artefacts with abrupt retouch and arched backs, and radiometric dating indicates that these two technocomplexes belong to the same window of time. Here, we provide a detailed, qualitative technological comparison of two Châtelperronian and two Uluzzian lithic assemblages based on a collaborative, first-hand examination of these collections. This study results from a one-week workshop designed to bring relevant researchers together to conduct an in-person investigation of these lithic industries. Our analysis highlights significant technological divergences between these industries. In short, the Châtelperronian is a blade industry with a minor bladelet component produced by freehand direct percussion, whereas the Uluzzian is a flake-bladelet industry with massive use of bipolar percussion and a minor component produced by freehand, direct percussion. Our results suggest that there are no, or very little, technological affinities between the Châtelperronian and the Uluzzian — despite occupying the same window of time. As an extension, this suggests that there was little to no relationship/contact between the groups producing these industries during the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition. The distinctiveness of the Châtelperronian and Uluzzian highlights that technological behaviours in western Europe during the 45–40 ka can be very diverse and that general labels such as ‘transitional industries’ are unsatisfactory in describing this diversity.
2025
Marciani, G., Carmignani, L., Djakovic, I., Roussel, M., Arrighi, S., Rossini, M., et al. (2025). The Uluzzian and Châtelperronian: No Technological Affinity in a Shared Chronological Framework. JOURNAL OF PALEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGY, 8(1), 1-30 [10.1007/s41982-024-00202-1].
Marciani, Giulia; Carmignani, Leonardo; Djakovic, Igor; Roussel, Morgan; Arrighi, Simona; Rossini, Matteo; Boschin, Francesco; Ronchitelli, Annamaria;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Marciani et al. 2025_Uluzzian and Chatelperronian.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 8.41 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.41 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
41982_2024_202_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 16.77 kB
Formato Microsoft Excel XML
16.77 kB Microsoft Excel XML Visualizza/Apri
41982_2024_202_MOESM2_ESM.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 14.48 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
14.48 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri
41982_2024_202_MOESM3_ESM.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 33.34 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
33.34 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1001135
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact