Motivational (i.e., appetitive or aversive) cues can bias value-based decisions by affecting either direction and intensity of instrumental actions. Despite several findings describing important interindividual differences in these biases, whether biological sex can also play a role is still up to debate. By comparing females and males in both appetitive and aversive Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer paradigms we found that, while motivational cues similarly bias the direction of instrumental actions in both sexes, the intensity of such actions is increased by the cue in male participants only. The present results constitute compelling evidence that a crucial motivational bias of daily actions directed to obtaining rewards or avoiding punishments is modulated by biological sex. This evidence sheds new light on the role of sex in motivational processes that underlie decision-making, highlighting the importance of considering sex as a crucial factor in future research on this topic.

Degni, L.A.E., Garofalo, S., Finotti, G., Starita, F., Robbins, T.W., di Pellegrino, G. (2024). Sex differences in motivational biases over instrumental actions. NPJ SCIENCE OF LEARNING, 9(1), 1-13 [10.1038/s41539-024-00246-6].

Sex differences in motivational biases over instrumental actions

Garofalo, Sara;Finotti, Gianluca;Starita, Francesca;di Pellegrino, Giuseppe
2024

Abstract

Motivational (i.e., appetitive or aversive) cues can bias value-based decisions by affecting either direction and intensity of instrumental actions. Despite several findings describing important interindividual differences in these biases, whether biological sex can also play a role is still up to debate. By comparing females and males in both appetitive and aversive Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer paradigms we found that, while motivational cues similarly bias the direction of instrumental actions in both sexes, the intensity of such actions is increased by the cue in male participants only. The present results constitute compelling evidence that a crucial motivational bias of daily actions directed to obtaining rewards or avoiding punishments is modulated by biological sex. This evidence sheds new light on the role of sex in motivational processes that underlie decision-making, highlighting the importance of considering sex as a crucial factor in future research on this topic.
2024
Degni, L.A.E., Garofalo, S., Finotti, G., Starita, F., Robbins, T.W., di Pellegrino, G. (2024). Sex differences in motivational biases over instrumental actions. NPJ SCIENCE OF LEARNING, 9(1), 1-13 [10.1038/s41539-024-00246-6].
Degni, Luigi A. E.; Garofalo, Sara; Finotti, Gianluca; Starita, Francesca; Robbins, Trevor W.; di Pellegrino, Giuseppe
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Degni et al 2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 1.56 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.56 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
41539_2024_246_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 248.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
248.3 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/999237
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact