Despite the growing interest in the policy work and analyticalcapacities of bureaucracies, these dimensions have not beentreated as central to characterizing and understanding the roleof senior civil servants in policymaking, which is usually con-ceptualized in terms of their relationship with policymakers orother organizational and societal factors. This article fills thisgap by proposing an analytical framework that allows the em-pirical classification of high-level civil servants according tothe “triangle of bureaucratic policy analysis”, which consists ofpossible links between their policy work, their policy analyticalcapacities, and the types of information they use. We apply thisanalytical lens to the results of a large survey of approximately1000 senior civil servants in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain.Our findings consist of three empirical professional types oftop bureaucrats, the “political generalist”, the “manager”, andthe “legal advisor”, each characterized by a particular combina-tion of specific policy analytical capacities, sources and types ofinformation used, and policy work. The proposed frameworkthus offers a promising conceptual lens for comparative re-search and demonstrates how a focus on the policy dimensionsof high-level officials' activities can provide a novel perspectiveon their roles.

Capano, G., Cavalieri, A., Pritoni, A. (2024). The triangle of bureaucratic policy analysis and the professional types of high-level civil servants: Empirical evidence from Southern Europe. POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2024 online first, 1-22 [10.1111/psj.12577].

The triangle of bureaucratic policy analysis and the professional types of high-level civil servants: Empirical evidence from Southern Europe

Capano, Giliberto
;
Pritoni, Andrea
2024

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in the policy work and analyticalcapacities of bureaucracies, these dimensions have not beentreated as central to characterizing and understanding the roleof senior civil servants in policymaking, which is usually con-ceptualized in terms of their relationship with policymakers orother organizational and societal factors. This article fills thisgap by proposing an analytical framework that allows the em-pirical classification of high-level civil servants according tothe “triangle of bureaucratic policy analysis”, which consists ofpossible links between their policy work, their policy analyticalcapacities, and the types of information they use. We apply thisanalytical lens to the results of a large survey of approximately1000 senior civil servants in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain.Our findings consist of three empirical professional types oftop bureaucrats, the “political generalist”, the “manager”, andthe “legal advisor”, each characterized by a particular combina-tion of specific policy analytical capacities, sources and types ofinformation used, and policy work. The proposed frameworkthus offers a promising conceptual lens for comparative re-search and demonstrates how a focus on the policy dimensionsof high-level officials' activities can provide a novel perspectiveon their roles.
2024
Capano, G., Cavalieri, A., Pritoni, A. (2024). The triangle of bureaucratic policy analysis and the professional types of high-level civil servants: Empirical evidence from Southern Europe. POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2024 online first, 1-22 [10.1111/psj.12577].
Capano, Giliberto; Cavalieri, Alice; Pritoni, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
(2024) Capano-Cavalieri-Pritoni_PSJ.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo (CCBYNCSA)
Dimensione 840.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
840.82 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/998511
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact