Agricultural environments, including crop and non-crop areas, often provide important pollen and nectar resources for managed and wild bees. However, these resources may be contaminated with pesticides detrimental to bees and other non-target organisms, including humans. Differences in life-history traits among bee species influence food resource exploitation and pesticide exposure. This study assesses the potential of honey bees (Apis mellifera) and mason bees (Osmia), two bee species with highly contrasting functional traits, as biological indicators of pesticide exposure in 34 Italian agricultural farms. Pollen loads of both species were used to identify pollen species collected and to analyse multi-residue levels of pesticides. Pesticide risk indexes were calculated for honey bees, mason bees and humans. In mason bees, pesticide risk was not influenced by plant diversity. In agreement with their pollen preferences and short foraging ranges, mason bees collected a high proportion of pollen from flowers of the target crop. Conversely, pesticide risk decreased with increasing pollen diversity in honey bees. In agreement with their generalist foraging habits and long foraging ranges honey bees collected a greater diversity of pollen species and a lower proportion of target crop pollen. Although honey bees and mason bees showed similar toxic loads and pesticide composition, at a field scale pesticide risk of one species is not a good indicator of the risk to the other species. Our study confirms that bees in agricultural environments are pervasively exposed to multi-residue pesticide loads. Exposure is conditioned by specific bee traits but is also highly context-dependent.

Sgolastra F., Arnan X., Azpiazu C., Bordoni A., Bosch J., Lenzi L., et al. (2024). Honey bees and mason bees as biological indicators of landscape pesticide loads: Different results but similar conclusions. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 166(September 2024), 1-10 [10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112425].

Honey bees and mason bees as biological indicators of landscape pesticide loads: Different results but similar conclusions

Sgolastra F.
;
Azpiazu C.;Bordoni A.;Lenzi L.;Parrilli M.;Porrini C.
2024

Abstract

Agricultural environments, including crop and non-crop areas, often provide important pollen and nectar resources for managed and wild bees. However, these resources may be contaminated with pesticides detrimental to bees and other non-target organisms, including humans. Differences in life-history traits among bee species influence food resource exploitation and pesticide exposure. This study assesses the potential of honey bees (Apis mellifera) and mason bees (Osmia), two bee species with highly contrasting functional traits, as biological indicators of pesticide exposure in 34 Italian agricultural farms. Pollen loads of both species were used to identify pollen species collected and to analyse multi-residue levels of pesticides. Pesticide risk indexes were calculated for honey bees, mason bees and humans. In mason bees, pesticide risk was not influenced by plant diversity. In agreement with their pollen preferences and short foraging ranges, mason bees collected a high proportion of pollen from flowers of the target crop. Conversely, pesticide risk decreased with increasing pollen diversity in honey bees. In agreement with their generalist foraging habits and long foraging ranges honey bees collected a greater diversity of pollen species and a lower proportion of target crop pollen. Although honey bees and mason bees showed similar toxic loads and pesticide composition, at a field scale pesticide risk of one species is not a good indicator of the risk to the other species. Our study confirms that bees in agricultural environments are pervasively exposed to multi-residue pesticide loads. Exposure is conditioned by specific bee traits but is also highly context-dependent.
2024
Sgolastra F., Arnan X., Azpiazu C., Bordoni A., Bosch J., Lenzi L., et al. (2024). Honey bees and mason bees as biological indicators of landscape pesticide loads: Different results but similar conclusions. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 166(September 2024), 1-10 [10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112425].
Sgolastra F.; Arnan X.; Azpiazu C.; Bordoni A.; Bosch J.; Lenzi L.; Martins C.; Parrilli M.; Porrini C.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sgolastra et al. 2024 Ecolnd.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 2.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Appendix S1.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 82.11 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
82.11 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri
Appendix S2.xlsx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 29.42 kB
Formato Microsoft Excel XML
29.42 kB Microsoft Excel XML Visualizza/Apri
Table A2.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 52.71 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
52.71 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri
Table A3.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 22.71 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
22.71 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri
Table A1.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 18.07 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
18.07 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/996341
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact