Purpose: Political participation has been identified as a predictor of mental health. Previous research studies have reported mixed results concerning the relationship between political participation and mental health. Moreover, findings have generally been confined to the between-individual level. The few studies that investigated within-person associations have not examined bidirectionality. In the current study, the bidirectional relationship between political participation and mental health was investigated. Methods: Data from the GESIS Panel study were used to assess the bidirectional association between political participation and mental health. The GESIS Panel study is a probability-based panel representative of the German-speaking population residing in Germany and aged between 18 and 70 years (M = 44.52; SD = 14.67; 52 percent female participants). Mental health was assessed using measures of depression symptoms and subjective well-being. Results: Using up to nine waves of longitudinal survey data, a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model indicated little evidence for cross-lagged effects from political participation to mental health or vice versa. Notwithstanding, few significant cross-lagged paths were observed. Conclusions: Overall, the findings were not consistent with the theorized effect of political participation on mental health. Moreover, there is little evidence that mental health affects political participation.

Prati G. (2024). The reciprocal relationship between political participation and mental health in Germany: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel analysis. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 105(5), 1751-1762 [10.1111/ssqu.13440].

The reciprocal relationship between political participation and mental health in Germany: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel analysis

Prati G.
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Political participation has been identified as a predictor of mental health. Previous research studies have reported mixed results concerning the relationship between political participation and mental health. Moreover, findings have generally been confined to the between-individual level. The few studies that investigated within-person associations have not examined bidirectionality. In the current study, the bidirectional relationship between political participation and mental health was investigated. Methods: Data from the GESIS Panel study were used to assess the bidirectional association between political participation and mental health. The GESIS Panel study is a probability-based panel representative of the German-speaking population residing in Germany and aged between 18 and 70 years (M = 44.52; SD = 14.67; 52 percent female participants). Mental health was assessed using measures of depression symptoms and subjective well-being. Results: Using up to nine waves of longitudinal survey data, a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model indicated little evidence for cross-lagged effects from political participation to mental health or vice versa. Notwithstanding, few significant cross-lagged paths were observed. Conclusions: Overall, the findings were not consistent with the theorized effect of political participation on mental health. Moreover, there is little evidence that mental health affects political participation.
2024
Prati G. (2024). The reciprocal relationship between political participation and mental health in Germany: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel analysis. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 105(5), 1751-1762 [10.1111/ssqu.13440].
Prati G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The reciprocal relationship between political participation and mental health in Germany A random‐intercept cross‐lagged panel analysis.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 161.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
161.46 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/995641
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact