: In the last two decades great improvements have been made in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, with 5-year overall survival rates currently approaching almost 90%. In comparison, results reported in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are relatively poor. In adults, results have improved, but are still lagging behind those obtained in children. Possible reasons for this different pattern of results include an increased incidence of unfavorable and a decreased incidence of favorable cytogenetic abnormalities in AYAs compared with children. Furthermore, in AYAs less intensive treatments (especially lower cumulative doses of drugs such as asparaginase, corticosteroids and methotrexate) and longer gaps between courses of chemotherapy are planned compared to those in children. However, although favorable results obtained in AYAs receiving pediatric protocols have been consistently reported in several international collaborative trials, physicians must also be aware of the specific toxicity pattern associated with increased success in AYAs, since an excess of toxicity may compromise overall treatment schedule intensity. Cooperative efforts between pediatric and adult hematologists in designing specific protocols for AYAs are warranted.

Rizzari, C., Putti, M.C., Colombini, A., Casagranda, S., Ferrari, G.M., Papayannidis, C., et al. (2014). Rationale for a Pediatric-Inspired Approach in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, with a Focus on Asparaginase Treatment. HEMATOLOGY REPORTS, 6(3), 51-57 [10.4081/hr.2014.5554].

Rationale for a Pediatric-Inspired Approach in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, with a Focus on Asparaginase Treatment

Ferrari, Giulia Maria;Papayannidis, Cristina;Iacobucci, Ilaria;Abbenante, Maria Chiara;Sartor, Chiara;Martinelli, Giovanni
2014

Abstract

: In the last two decades great improvements have been made in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, with 5-year overall survival rates currently approaching almost 90%. In comparison, results reported in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are relatively poor. In adults, results have improved, but are still lagging behind those obtained in children. Possible reasons for this different pattern of results include an increased incidence of unfavorable and a decreased incidence of favorable cytogenetic abnormalities in AYAs compared with children. Furthermore, in AYAs less intensive treatments (especially lower cumulative doses of drugs such as asparaginase, corticosteroids and methotrexate) and longer gaps between courses of chemotherapy are planned compared to those in children. However, although favorable results obtained in AYAs receiving pediatric protocols have been consistently reported in several international collaborative trials, physicians must also be aware of the specific toxicity pattern associated with increased success in AYAs, since an excess of toxicity may compromise overall treatment schedule intensity. Cooperative efforts between pediatric and adult hematologists in designing specific protocols for AYAs are warranted.
2014
Rizzari, C., Putti, M.C., Colombini, A., Casagranda, S., Ferrari, G.M., Papayannidis, C., et al. (2014). Rationale for a Pediatric-Inspired Approach in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, with a Focus on Asparaginase Treatment. HEMATOLOGY REPORTS, 6(3), 51-57 [10.4081/hr.2014.5554].
Rizzari, Carmelo; Putti, Maria Caterina; Colombini, Antonella; Casagranda, Sara; Ferrari, Giulia Maria; Papayannidis, Cristina; Iacobucci, Ilaria; Abb...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/995519
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact