Abstract OBJECTIVES Thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortic stenosis may be concomitant diseases requiring both transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (T/EVAR) in high-risk patients for surgical approaches, but temporal management is not clearly defined yet. The aim of the study was to analyse outcomes of simultaneous versus staged TAVI and T/EVAR. METHODS Retrospective observational multicentre study was performed on patients requiring TAVI and T/EVAR from 2016 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: ‘Simultaneous group’ if T/EVAR + TAVI were performed in the same procedure and ‘Staged group’ if T/EVAR and TAVI were performed in 2 steps, but within 3 months. Primary outcomes were technical success, 30-day mortality/major adverse events and follow-up survival. Secondary outcomes were procedural metrics and length of stay. RESULTS Forty-four cases were collected; 8 (18%) had T/EVAR and 36 (82%) had EVAR, respectively. Upon temporal determination, 25 (57%) and 19 (43%) were clustered in Simultaneous and Staged groups, respectively. In Staged group, median time between procedures was 72 (interquartile range—IQR: 57–87) days. Preoperative and intraoperative figures were similar. There was no difference in 30-day mortality (Simultaneous: 0/25 versus Staged: 1/19; P = 0.43). Pulmonary events (Simultaneous: 0/25 versus Staged: 5/19; P = 0.01) and need of postoperative cardiac pacemaker (Simultaneous: 2/25 versus Staged: 7/19; P = 0.02) were more frequent in Staged patients. The overall length of stay was lower in the Simultaneous group [Simultaneous: 7 (IQR: 6–8) versus Staged: 19 (IQR: 15–23) days; P = 0.001]. The median follow-up was 25 (IQR: 8–42) months and estimated 3-year survival was 73% with no difference between groups (Simultaneous: 82% versus Staged: 74%; P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS Both Simultaneous or Staged T/EVAR and TAVI procedures are effective with satisfactory outcomes. Despite the small numbers, simultaneous repair seems to reduce length of stay and pulmonary complications, maintaining similar follow-up survival. Objectives: Thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysms(T/AAAs) and aortic stenosis(AS) may be concomitant diseases requiring both transcatheter aortic valve implantation(TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair(T/EVAR) in high risk patients for surgical approaches, but temporal management is not clearly defined, yet. Aim of the study was to analyze outcomes of simultaneous vs staged TAVI and T/EVAR. Methods: Retrospective observational multicentre study on patients requiring TAVI and T/EVAR from 2016 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: "Simultaneous group" if T/EVAR+TAVI were performed in the same procedure and "Staged group" if T/EVAR and TAVI were performed in two steps, but within 3 months. Primary outcomes were: technical success, 30-day mortality/major adverse events and follow-up survival. Secondary outcomes were procedural metrics and length of stay (LOS). Results: Forty-four cases were collected; 8(18%) had TEVAR and 36(82%) EVAR, respectively. Upon temporal determination 25(57%) and 19(43%) were clustered in simultaneous and staged groups, respectively. In staged group, median time between procedures was 72(interquartile-range-IQR : 57-87) days. Preoperative and intraoperative figures were similar. There was no difference in 30-day mortality(Simultanoeus : 0/25 vs Staged : 1/19; p = 0.43). Pulmonary events(Simultaneous : 0/25 vs Staged : 5/19; p = 0.01) and need of postoperative cardiac pacemaker(Simultaneous : 2/25 vs Staged : 7/19; p = 0.02) were more frequent in Staged patients. The overall LOS was lower in Simultaneous group[Simultaneous : 7(IQR : 6-8) vs Staged : 19(IQR : 15-23)days; p = 0.001]. The median follow-up was 25(IQR : 8-42) months and estimated 3-year survival was 73% with no difference between groups(Simultanoeus : 82% vs Staged : 74%; p = 0.90). Conclusions: Both simultaneous or staged T/EVAR and TAVI procedures are effective with satisfactory outcomes. Despite the small numbers, simultaneous repair seems to reduce length-of-stay and pulmonary complications, maintaining similar follow-up survival.
Gallitto, E., Spath, P., Faggioli, G.L., Saia, F., Palmerini, T., Piazza, M., et al. (2024). Simultaneous versus staged approach in transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe stenosis and endovascular aortic repair for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 66(5), 1-8 [10.1093/ejcts/ezae379].
Simultaneous versus staged approach in transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe stenosis and endovascular aortic repair for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm
Gallitto, EnricoPrimo
;Spath, Paolo
Secondo
;Faggioli, Gian Luca;Saia, Francesco;Palmerini, Tullio;Cappiello, Antonio;Gargiulo, Mauro;Bramucci, AMembro del Collaboration Group
;Cecere, F;D'Oria, M;Faggioli, G L;Gallitto, E;Lodato, M;Palmerini, T;Rizza, A;Saia, F;Spath, P;Tozzi, M;
2024
Abstract
Abstract OBJECTIVES Thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortic stenosis may be concomitant diseases requiring both transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (T/EVAR) in high-risk patients for surgical approaches, but temporal management is not clearly defined yet. The aim of the study was to analyse outcomes of simultaneous versus staged TAVI and T/EVAR. METHODS Retrospective observational multicentre study was performed on patients requiring TAVI and T/EVAR from 2016 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: ‘Simultaneous group’ if T/EVAR + TAVI were performed in the same procedure and ‘Staged group’ if T/EVAR and TAVI were performed in 2 steps, but within 3 months. Primary outcomes were technical success, 30-day mortality/major adverse events and follow-up survival. Secondary outcomes were procedural metrics and length of stay. RESULTS Forty-four cases were collected; 8 (18%) had T/EVAR and 36 (82%) had EVAR, respectively. Upon temporal determination, 25 (57%) and 19 (43%) were clustered in Simultaneous and Staged groups, respectively. In Staged group, median time between procedures was 72 (interquartile range—IQR: 57–87) days. Preoperative and intraoperative figures were similar. There was no difference in 30-day mortality (Simultaneous: 0/25 versus Staged: 1/19; P = 0.43). Pulmonary events (Simultaneous: 0/25 versus Staged: 5/19; P = 0.01) and need of postoperative cardiac pacemaker (Simultaneous: 2/25 versus Staged: 7/19; P = 0.02) were more frequent in Staged patients. The overall length of stay was lower in the Simultaneous group [Simultaneous: 7 (IQR: 6–8) versus Staged: 19 (IQR: 15–23) days; P = 0.001]. The median follow-up was 25 (IQR: 8–42) months and estimated 3-year survival was 73% with no difference between groups (Simultaneous: 82% versus Staged: 74%; P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS Both Simultaneous or Staged T/EVAR and TAVI procedures are effective with satisfactory outcomes. Despite the small numbers, simultaneous repair seems to reduce length of stay and pulmonary complications, maintaining similar follow-up survival. Objectives: Thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysms(T/AAAs) and aortic stenosis(AS) may be concomitant diseases requiring both transcatheter aortic valve implantation(TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair(T/EVAR) in high risk patients for surgical approaches, but temporal management is not clearly defined, yet. Aim of the study was to analyze outcomes of simultaneous vs staged TAVI and T/EVAR. Methods: Retrospective observational multicentre study on patients requiring TAVI and T/EVAR from 2016 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: "Simultaneous group" if T/EVAR+TAVI were performed in the same procedure and "Staged group" if T/EVAR and TAVI were performed in two steps, but within 3 months. Primary outcomes were: technical success, 30-day mortality/major adverse events and follow-up survival. Secondary outcomes were procedural metrics and length of stay (LOS). Results: Forty-four cases were collected; 8(18%) had TEVAR and 36(82%) EVAR, respectively. Upon temporal determination 25(57%) and 19(43%) were clustered in simultaneous and staged groups, respectively. In staged group, median time between procedures was 72(interquartile-range-IQR : 57-87) days. Preoperative and intraoperative figures were similar. There was no difference in 30-day mortality(Simultanoeus : 0/25 vs Staged : 1/19; p = 0.43). Pulmonary events(Simultaneous : 0/25 vs Staged : 5/19; p = 0.01) and need of postoperative cardiac pacemaker(Simultaneous : 2/25 vs Staged : 7/19; p = 0.02) were more frequent in Staged patients. The overall LOS was lower in Simultaneous group[Simultaneous : 7(IQR : 6-8) vs Staged : 19(IQR : 15-23)days; p = 0.001]. The median follow-up was 25(IQR : 8-42) months and estimated 3-year survival was 73% with no difference between groups(Simultanoeus : 82% vs Staged : 74%; p = 0.90). Conclusions: Both simultaneous or staged T/EVAR and TAVI procedures are effective with satisfactory outcomes. Despite the small numbers, simultaneous repair seems to reduce length-of-stay and pulmonary complications, maintaining similar follow-up survival.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Second_Simultaneous versus staged approach in TAVI_2024_EurJCardiothSurg.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
1.67 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.67 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
ezae379_supplementary_data.docx
accesso aperto
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
18.41 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
18.41 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.