Introduction: This is a multicentric study on the use of heavy silicon oil (HSO) as an intraocular tamponade for inferior retinal detachment (RD) complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). Methods: 139 eyes treated for RD with PVR were included in the study. 10 (7.2%) were affected by primary RD with inferior PVR, while 129 (92.8%) were affected by recurrent RD with inferior PVR. 102 eyes (73.9%) had received a silicon oil (SO) tamponade in a previous intervention prior to receiving HSO. Mean follow-up was 36.5 (standard deviation = 32.3) months. Results: The median interval between HSO injection and removal was 4 months (interquartile range: 3). At the time of HSO removal, the retina was attached in 120 eyes (87.6%), whereas in 17 eyes (12.4%), it had re-detached while the HSO was in situ. 32 eyes (23.2%) showed recurrent RD. A subsequent RD relapse was observed in 14.2% of cases with no RD at the time of HSO removal, and in 88.2% if an RD was present at the time of HSO removal. Advancing age showed a positive association with retinal attachment at the end of follow-up, while the risk of RD relapse at the end of the follow-up showed a significant negative association with HSO tamponade duration and with the use of SO rather than air or gas as post-HSO tamponade materials. Mean best corrected visual acuity was 1.1 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution at all follow-up time points. 56 cases (40.3%) needed treatment for elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), with which no clinically relevant variables were associated during follow-up. Conclusion: HSO represents a safe and effective tamponade in cases of inferior RD with PVR. The presence of RD at the time of HSO removal is a negative prognostic factor for the development of a subsequent RD relapse. According to our findings, in cases of RD at the time of HSO removal, a short-term tamponade should definitely be avoided, in favor of SO. Special attention must be paid to the risk of IOP elevation, and patients should be closely monitored.
Mete, M., Parolini, B., Maggio, E., Airaghi, G., De Santis, N., Guerriero, M., et al. (2023). Use of Heavy Silicon Oil as Intraocular Tamponade for Inferior Retinal Detachment Complicated by Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: A Multicentric Experience. OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 246(3-4), 209-218 [10.1159/000531141].
Use of Heavy Silicon Oil as Intraocular Tamponade for Inferior Retinal Detachment Complicated by Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: A Multicentric Experience
Mete M.
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2023
Abstract
Introduction: This is a multicentric study on the use of heavy silicon oil (HSO) as an intraocular tamponade for inferior retinal detachment (RD) complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). Methods: 139 eyes treated for RD with PVR were included in the study. 10 (7.2%) were affected by primary RD with inferior PVR, while 129 (92.8%) were affected by recurrent RD with inferior PVR. 102 eyes (73.9%) had received a silicon oil (SO) tamponade in a previous intervention prior to receiving HSO. Mean follow-up was 36.5 (standard deviation = 32.3) months. Results: The median interval between HSO injection and removal was 4 months (interquartile range: 3). At the time of HSO removal, the retina was attached in 120 eyes (87.6%), whereas in 17 eyes (12.4%), it had re-detached while the HSO was in situ. 32 eyes (23.2%) showed recurrent RD. A subsequent RD relapse was observed in 14.2% of cases with no RD at the time of HSO removal, and in 88.2% if an RD was present at the time of HSO removal. Advancing age showed a positive association with retinal attachment at the end of follow-up, while the risk of RD relapse at the end of the follow-up showed a significant negative association with HSO tamponade duration and with the use of SO rather than air or gas as post-HSO tamponade materials. Mean best corrected visual acuity was 1.1 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution at all follow-up time points. 56 cases (40.3%) needed treatment for elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), with which no clinically relevant variables were associated during follow-up. Conclusion: HSO represents a safe and effective tamponade in cases of inferior RD with PVR. The presence of RD at the time of HSO removal is a negative prognostic factor for the development of a subsequent RD relapse. According to our findings, in cases of RD at the time of HSO removal, a short-term tamponade should definitely be avoided, in favor of SO. Special attention must be paid to the risk of IOP elevation, and patients should be closely monitored.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
