Mechanisms involved in the initiation of fibrillation and defibrillation are complex and still not totally understood. This paper computationally investigated the effect of monophasic, biphasic and reversed biphasic stimuli on single cardiomyocyte, with a modified Ten Tusscher model of human ventricular action potential (AP) and calcium dynamics. Three different S1-S2 protocols with variable duration were used: monophasic, biphasic and reversed biphasic. Results were expressed in terms of total response duration (TRD), defined as the interval between the S1 onset and the response generated by S2. TRD was focused both on AP (Vm-TRD) and on Calcium transient (Ca-TRD). Simulations confirmed previous results obtained with the Beeler-Reuter model pointing to the role of INa in prolonging the refractory period when using a biphasic stimulus. No differential effects of biphasic vs monophasic stimulation when CaTRDs are compared instead of Vm-TRDs were found.

M. Caselli, S. Severi, A. Casaleggio (2010). Monophasic vs. Biphasic Stimulation of Single Cardiomyocite Cell: a Simulation Study.

Monophasic vs. Biphasic Stimulation of Single Cardiomyocite Cell: a Simulation Study

SEVERI, STEFANO;
2010

Abstract

Mechanisms involved in the initiation of fibrillation and defibrillation are complex and still not totally understood. This paper computationally investigated the effect of monophasic, biphasic and reversed biphasic stimuli on single cardiomyocyte, with a modified Ten Tusscher model of human ventricular action potential (AP) and calcium dynamics. Three different S1-S2 protocols with variable duration were used: monophasic, biphasic and reversed biphasic. Results were expressed in terms of total response duration (TRD), defined as the interval between the S1 onset and the response generated by S2. TRD was focused both on AP (Vm-TRD) and on Calcium transient (Ca-TRD). Simulations confirmed previous results obtained with the Beeler-Reuter model pointing to the role of INa in prolonging the refractory period when using a biphasic stimulus. No differential effects of biphasic vs monophasic stimulation when CaTRDs are compared instead of Vm-TRDs were found.
2010
625
628
M. Caselli, S. Severi, A. Casaleggio (2010). Monophasic vs. Biphasic Stimulation of Single Cardiomyocite Cell: a Simulation Study.
M. Caselli; S. Severi; A. Casaleggio
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/98437
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact