This article aims to provide a critical edition of an unpublished treatise de soloecismo et barbarismo made up of three shorter sections (περὶ ἑλληνισμοῦ, περὶ σολοικισμοῦ, περὶ βαρβαρισμοῦ), which has been transmitted by the Ambr. C 222 inf., f. 212v. The edition reveals that this text belongs to the same tradition as a group of scholia to Dionysius Thrax’s Τέχνη γραμματική preserved in two 15th-century manuscripts, the so-called scholia Londinensia (Σl). In addition to being older than the already known scholia witnesses, the manuscript offers a more complete text, and in several instances sheds light on the origins of errors in the tradition of the scholia.
Claudia Nuovo (2024). Un ‘nuovo’ trattato de soloecismo et barbarismo. AEVUM, 98(2), 391-412.
Un ‘nuovo’ trattato de soloecismo et barbarismo
Claudia Nuovo
2024
Abstract
This article aims to provide a critical edition of an unpublished treatise de soloecismo et barbarismo made up of three shorter sections (περὶ ἑλληνισμοῦ, περὶ σολοικισμοῦ, περὶ βαρβαρισμοῦ), which has been transmitted by the Ambr. C 222 inf., f. 212v. The edition reveals that this text belongs to the same tradition as a group of scholia to Dionysius Thrax’s Τέχνη γραμματική preserved in two 15th-century manuscripts, the so-called scholia Londinensia (Σl). In addition to being older than the already known scholia witnesses, the manuscript offers a more complete text, and in several instances sheds light on the origins of errors in the tradition of the scholia.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.