Policy networks can propose solutions (policy communities, and epistemic communities), defend specific instruments (instrument constituencies), and programmatically prioritize change or stability (programmatic groups). This paper focuses on two specific networks that have been present in 30 years of administrative reform in Italy, and it empirically assesses what type of network they are according to their origins, developments over time, membership and motivations to stay together, and role in the policymaking. This comparison, while improving the current understanding of the networking taking place in the Italian administrative reform, shows that if policy networks are very relevant in the policy process, it is analytically more fruitful and empirically more reliable to assess their characteristics empirically, rather than to assume their existence in advance (and make hypotheses on this basis) or to use the concept in a purely metaphorical manner.(?,(?,(?. 30?,,,?.""?:???(?.Las redes de politicas pueden proponer soluciones (comunidades de politicas y comunidades epistemicas), defender instrumentos especificos (grupos de instrumentos) y priorizar programaticamente el cambio o la estabilidad (grupos programaticos). Este articulo se centra en dos redes especificas que han estado presentes durante 30 anos de reforma administrativa en Italia, y+ evalua empiricamente que tipo de red son segun sus origenes, evolucion a lo largo del tiempo, membresia y motivaciones para permanecer juntas, y papel en el proceso. formulacion de politicas. Esta comparacion, si bien mejora la comprension actual de las redes que tienen lugar en la reforma administrativa italiana, muestra que, si las redes de politicas son muy relevantes en el proceso politico, es analiticamente mas fructifero y empiricamente mas confiable evaluar sus caracteristicas empiricamente, en lugar de hacerlo. asumir su existencia de antemano (y formular hipotesis sobre esta base) o utilizar el concepto de una manera puramente metaforica.

Capano, G., Erittu, E., Francisci, G., Natalini, A. (2024). Assessing the types of policy networks in policymaking: Empirical evidence from administrative reform in Italy. EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS, 10(3), 311-333 [10.1002/epa2.1204].

Assessing the types of policy networks in policymaking: Empirical evidence from administrative reform in Italy

Capano, Giliberto
;
Erittu, Eleonora;
2024

Abstract

Policy networks can propose solutions (policy communities, and epistemic communities), defend specific instruments (instrument constituencies), and programmatically prioritize change or stability (programmatic groups). This paper focuses on two specific networks that have been present in 30 years of administrative reform in Italy, and it empirically assesses what type of network they are according to their origins, developments over time, membership and motivations to stay together, and role in the policymaking. This comparison, while improving the current understanding of the networking taking place in the Italian administrative reform, shows that if policy networks are very relevant in the policy process, it is analytically more fruitful and empirically more reliable to assess their characteristics empirically, rather than to assume their existence in advance (and make hypotheses on this basis) or to use the concept in a purely metaphorical manner.(?,(?,(?. 30?,,,?.""?:???(?.Las redes de politicas pueden proponer soluciones (comunidades de politicas y comunidades epistemicas), defender instrumentos especificos (grupos de instrumentos) y priorizar programaticamente el cambio o la estabilidad (grupos programaticos). Este articulo se centra en dos redes especificas que han estado presentes durante 30 anos de reforma administrativa en Italia, y+ evalua empiricamente que tipo de red son segun sus origenes, evolucion a lo largo del tiempo, membresia y motivaciones para permanecer juntas, y papel en el proceso. formulacion de politicas. Esta comparacion, si bien mejora la comprension actual de las redes que tienen lugar en la reforma administrativa italiana, muestra que, si las redes de politicas son muy relevantes en el proceso politico, es analiticamente mas fructifero y empiricamente mas confiable evaluar sus caracteristicas empiricamente, en lugar de hacerlo. asumir su existencia de antemano (y formular hipotesis sobre esta base) o utilizar el concepto de una manera puramente metaforica.
2024
Capano, G., Erittu, E., Francisci, G., Natalini, A. (2024). Assessing the types of policy networks in policymaking: Empirical evidence from administrative reform in Italy. EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS, 10(3), 311-333 [10.1002/epa2.1204].
Capano, Giliberto; Erittu, Eleonora; Francisci, Giulio; Natalini, Alessandro
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Assessing the types of policy networks in policymaking Empirical evidence from.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 708.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
708.2 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Materiale supplementare.docx

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Materiale supplementare
Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 47.1 MB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
47.1 MB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/979674
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact