Changing a database schema is a fact of life in information systems, as a response to changes inside the enterprise (e.g., new users' requirements, correction of errors in the current database schema) or outside it (e.g., new regulations, new partners' requirements). In the database research field, a well-known technique has been proposed for managing schema changes, called schema evolution. It allows the database to survive schema changes by adapting existing data to conform to the new schema. A lot of research efforts addressed the topic of schema evolution, in both conventional (i.e., relational) and advanced (e.g., XML, stream, NoSQL) databases, providing a plethora of heterogeneous approaches and solutions making up a quite large literature. Since there is no research work that extensively deals with different proposals and compares them, the purpose of this paper is to fill this gap by reviewing the available schema evolution literature. For that, first we collected and summarized the contributions of research papers dealing with database schema evolution. Then we organized their presentation in a chronological order, also giving a historical perspective on the topic development. Finally, we defined a list of six comparison criteria (database model, implementation, schema change semantics, schema change propagation, integrity constraints, and software evolution) that have helped us to categorize and compare the different database schema evolution proposals. In sum, our paper (i) provides an overview of the state-of-the-art research approaches on database schema evolution, with tables that compare such approaches based on some proposed criteria,

Brahmia, Z., Grandi, F., Oliboni, B. (2024). A Literature Review on Schema Evolution in Databases, 02(2430001), 1-54 [10.1142/s2972370124300012].

A Literature Review on Schema Evolution in Databases

Grandi, Fabio;
2024

Abstract

Changing a database schema is a fact of life in information systems, as a response to changes inside the enterprise (e.g., new users' requirements, correction of errors in the current database schema) or outside it (e.g., new regulations, new partners' requirements). In the database research field, a well-known technique has been proposed for managing schema changes, called schema evolution. It allows the database to survive schema changes by adapting existing data to conform to the new schema. A lot of research efforts addressed the topic of schema evolution, in both conventional (i.e., relational) and advanced (e.g., XML, stream, NoSQL) databases, providing a plethora of heterogeneous approaches and solutions making up a quite large literature. Since there is no research work that extensively deals with different proposals and compares them, the purpose of this paper is to fill this gap by reviewing the available schema evolution literature. For that, first we collected and summarized the contributions of research papers dealing with database schema evolution. Then we organized their presentation in a chronological order, also giving a historical perspective on the topic development. Finally, we defined a list of six comparison criteria (database model, implementation, schema change semantics, schema change propagation, integrity constraints, and software evolution) that have helped us to categorize and compare the different database schema evolution proposals. In sum, our paper (i) provides an overview of the state-of-the-art research approaches on database schema evolution, with tables that compare such approaches based on some proposed criteria,
2024
Brahmia, Z., Grandi, F., Oliboni, B. (2024). A Literature Review on Schema Evolution in Databases, 02(2430001), 1-54 [10.1142/s2972370124300012].
Brahmia, Zouhaier; Grandi, Fabio; Oliboni, Barbara
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/974714
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact