In this essay, I investigate the ways in which abolitionists and pro-slavery forces use Tocqueville before and during the Civil War, drawing on the major black and white abolitionist newspapers (The Liberator, National Anti-Slavery Standard, The National Era, The North Star, and The Colored American). By focusing on the dissemination of Tocqueville’s ideas within a specific audience of white abolitionists, and on the impact of blacks’ criticism on this process, I challenge Tocqueville’s abolitionist arguments. Thus, using Tocqueville as a prism through which to discuss some of the key issues surrounding the abolitionist struggles, I show that the author’s reception depends on the relevance of these struggles and claims for the definition of democracy itself as an endless and potentially unmanageable process.

Guerini, A. (2024). Ambivalent Democracies. Uses and Misuses of Tocqueville Within the Abolitionist Debate (1839–1865). THE TOCQUEVILLE REVIEW, 45(1), 247-271 [10.3138/ttr.45.1.247].

Ambivalent Democracies. Uses and Misuses of Tocqueville Within the Abolitionist Debate (1839–1865)

Anna Guerini
2024

Abstract

In this essay, I investigate the ways in which abolitionists and pro-slavery forces use Tocqueville before and during the Civil War, drawing on the major black and white abolitionist newspapers (The Liberator, National Anti-Slavery Standard, The National Era, The North Star, and The Colored American). By focusing on the dissemination of Tocqueville’s ideas within a specific audience of white abolitionists, and on the impact of blacks’ criticism on this process, I challenge Tocqueville’s abolitionist arguments. Thus, using Tocqueville as a prism through which to discuss some of the key issues surrounding the abolitionist struggles, I show that the author’s reception depends on the relevance of these struggles and claims for the definition of democracy itself as an endless and potentially unmanageable process.
2024
Guerini, A. (2024). Ambivalent Democracies. Uses and Misuses of Tocqueville Within the Abolitionist Debate (1839–1865). THE TOCQUEVILLE REVIEW, 45(1), 247-271 [10.3138/ttr.45.1.247].
Guerini, Anna
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Guerini_2024_Ambivalent_democracies.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione 3.87 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.87 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/974258
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact