This article analyses party strategies during the campaign for the Dutch general election of March 2017, making use of issue-yield theory. It investigates whether parties strategically emphasise high-yield issues, by juxtaposing the issue opportunities provided by voters with parties’ issue emphasis during the campaign. More specifically, it asks whether parties strategically emphasised issues that were expected to reward them electorally. Analysing voter preferences and party campaign data, it is found that parties and most of their constituencies show high ideological consistency, that parties emphasise mostly positional issues and thus choose a conflict-mobilising strategy, and that most parties emphasise high-yield issues rather than following the general political agenda. Four small parties that won significantly behaved strategically while the social democrats–who severely lost–hardly did. The findings imply that the issue-yield framework can help to explain the election result in the fragmented Dutch multi-party context.

van Ditmars M.M., Maggini N., van Spanje J. (2020). Small winners and big losers: strategic party behaviour in the 2017 Dutch general election. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 43(3), 543-564 [10.1080/01402382.2019.1655959].

Small winners and big losers: strategic party behaviour in the 2017 Dutch general election

Maggini N.;
2020

Abstract

This article analyses party strategies during the campaign for the Dutch general election of March 2017, making use of issue-yield theory. It investigates whether parties strategically emphasise high-yield issues, by juxtaposing the issue opportunities provided by voters with parties’ issue emphasis during the campaign. More specifically, it asks whether parties strategically emphasised issues that were expected to reward them electorally. Analysing voter preferences and party campaign data, it is found that parties and most of their constituencies show high ideological consistency, that parties emphasise mostly positional issues and thus choose a conflict-mobilising strategy, and that most parties emphasise high-yield issues rather than following the general political agenda. Four small parties that won significantly behaved strategically while the social democrats–who severely lost–hardly did. The findings imply that the issue-yield framework can help to explain the election result in the fragmented Dutch multi-party context.
2020
van Ditmars M.M., Maggini N., van Spanje J. (2020). Small winners and big losers: strategic party behaviour in the 2017 Dutch general election. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 43(3), 543-564 [10.1080/01402382.2019.1655959].
van Ditmars M.M.; Maggini N.; van Spanje J.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Appendices.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Materiale supplementare
Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 41.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
41.21 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Small winners and big losers.pdf

Open Access dal 18/04/2021

Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 814.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
814.33 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/968903
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact