In hybrid peace governance, liberal and illiberal norms, institutions, and actors exist alongside each other, interact, and even clash. Such a political, economic, and social order is a far cry from the liberal idea of peace based on legitimate and accountable democratic institutions, the rule of law, human rights, free media, market economy, and an open civil society. This article accounts for the emergence of hybrid peace governance and de- velops a typology based on the war/peace and liberal/illiberal spectra. Fur- thermore, it discusses the implications of hybridity and, in particular, whether it can avoid the pitfalls of top-down liberal peacebuilding and provide new opportunities for a more sustainable, locally engrained ver- sion of peace. KEYWORDS: peacebuilding, governance, hybridity.
Belloni, R., A. Jarstad (2012). Hybrid Peace Governance: Impact and Prospects of Liberal Peacebuilding. GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, 18(18 (1)), 1-6.
Hybrid Peace Governance: Impact and Prospects of Liberal Peacebuilding
Belloni, Roberto;
2012
Abstract
In hybrid peace governance, liberal and illiberal norms, institutions, and actors exist alongside each other, interact, and even clash. Such a political, economic, and social order is a far cry from the liberal idea of peace based on legitimate and accountable democratic institutions, the rule of law, human rights, free media, market economy, and an open civil society. This article accounts for the emergence of hybrid peace governance and de- velops a typology based on the war/peace and liberal/illiberal spectra. Fur- thermore, it discusses the implications of hybridity and, in particular, whether it can avoid the pitfalls of top-down liberal peacebuilding and provide new opportunities for a more sustainable, locally engrained ver- sion of peace. KEYWORDS: peacebuilding, governance, hybridity.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.