Surface codes are versatile quantum error- correcting codes known for their planar geometry, making them ideal for practical implementations. While the original proposal used Pauli X or Pauli Z operators in a square structure, these codes can be improved by rotating the lattice or incorporating a mix of generators in the XZZX variant. However, a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the logical error rate for these variants has been lacking. To address this gap, we present theoretical formulas based on recent advancements in understanding the weight distribution of stabilizer codes. For example, over an asymmetric channel with asymmetry A = 10 and a physical error rate p → 0, we observe that the logical error rate asymptotically approaches pL → 10p^2 for the rotated [[9, 1, 3]] XZZX code and pL → 18.3p^2 for the [[13, 1, 3]] surface code. Additionally, we observe a particular behavior regarding rectangular lattices in the presence of asymmetric channels. Our findings demonstrate that implementing both rotation and XZZX modifications simultaneously can lead to suboptimal performance. Thus, in scenarios involving a rectangular lattice, it is advisable to avoid using both modifications simultaneously.
Forlivesi, D., Valentini, L., Chiani, M. (2024). Logical Error Rates of XZZX and Rotated Quantum Surface Codes. IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 42(7), 1-10 [10.1109/jsac.2024.3380088].
Logical Error Rates of XZZX and Rotated Quantum Surface Codes
Forlivesi, DiegoPrimo
;Valentini, LorenzoSecondo
;Chiani, Marco
Ultimo
2024
Abstract
Surface codes are versatile quantum error- correcting codes known for their planar geometry, making them ideal for practical implementations. While the original proposal used Pauli X or Pauli Z operators in a square structure, these codes can be improved by rotating the lattice or incorporating a mix of generators in the XZZX variant. However, a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the logical error rate for these variants has been lacking. To address this gap, we present theoretical formulas based on recent advancements in understanding the weight distribution of stabilizer codes. For example, over an asymmetric channel with asymmetry A = 10 and a physical error rate p → 0, we observe that the logical error rate asymptotically approaches pL → 10p^2 for the rotated [[9, 1, 3]] XZZX code and pL → 18.3p^2 for the [[13, 1, 3]] surface code. Additionally, we observe a particular behavior regarding rectangular lattices in the presence of asymmetric channels. Our findings demonstrate that implementing both rotation and XZZX modifications simultaneously can lead to suboptimal performance. Thus, in scenarios involving a rectangular lattice, it is advisable to avoid using both modifications simultaneously.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Logical_Error_Rates_of_XZZX_and_Rotated_Quantum_Surface_Codes.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
5.62 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
5.62 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.