We conducted an economic evaluation of intravenous (IV) vs subcutaneous (SC) trastuzumab for the treatment of patients with early breast cancer (EBC). Data of patients receiving adjuvant IV trastuzumab at our institute in 2014 were used to study three different treatment scenarios: 1) IV trastuzumab, 2) SC trastuzumab, and 3) IV trastuzumab during chemotherapy followed by SC trastuzumab. Our cohort included 114 patients with a median weight of 63.75 kg. Scenario 2 was the most time-saving treatment, with 71.7% reduction in preparation time and 89.3% reduction in chair time compared to scenario 1. Considering full costs, the mean costs per patient/year were € 14,233 ± 8,698 for scenario 1, € 14,272 ± 8,312 for scenario 2, and € 14,535 ± 8,646 for scenario 3 (p = 0.959). When mean body weight was > 65.2 kg, the mean cost was lower in scenario 2 than in scenario 1. Scenario 2 proved a valuable time-saving and cost-saving option. A shift from IV to SC trastuzumab should be considered, especially in capacity-constrained oncology departments. Copyright: Farolfi et al.

Resource utilization and cost saving analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab in early breast cancer patients / Farolfi A.; Silimbani P.; Gallegati D.; Petracci E.; Schirone A.; Altini M.; Masini C.. - In: ONCOTARGET. - ISSN 1949-2553. - ELETTRONICO. - 8:46(2017), pp. 81343-81349. [10.18632/oncotarget.18527]

Resource utilization and cost saving analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab in early breast cancer patients

Farolfi A.;Petracci E.;
2017

Abstract

We conducted an economic evaluation of intravenous (IV) vs subcutaneous (SC) trastuzumab for the treatment of patients with early breast cancer (EBC). Data of patients receiving adjuvant IV trastuzumab at our institute in 2014 were used to study three different treatment scenarios: 1) IV trastuzumab, 2) SC trastuzumab, and 3) IV trastuzumab during chemotherapy followed by SC trastuzumab. Our cohort included 114 patients with a median weight of 63.75 kg. Scenario 2 was the most time-saving treatment, with 71.7% reduction in preparation time and 89.3% reduction in chair time compared to scenario 1. Considering full costs, the mean costs per patient/year were € 14,233 ± 8,698 for scenario 1, € 14,272 ± 8,312 for scenario 2, and € 14,535 ± 8,646 for scenario 3 (p = 0.959). When mean body weight was > 65.2 kg, the mean cost was lower in scenario 2 than in scenario 1. Scenario 2 proved a valuable time-saving and cost-saving option. A shift from IV to SC trastuzumab should be considered, especially in capacity-constrained oncology departments. Copyright: Farolfi et al.
2017
Resource utilization and cost saving analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab in early breast cancer patients / Farolfi A.; Silimbani P.; Gallegati D.; Petracci E.; Schirone A.; Altini M.; Masini C.. - In: ONCOTARGET. - ISSN 1949-2553. - ELETTRONICO. - 8:46(2017), pp. 81343-81349. [10.18632/oncotarget.18527]
Farolfi A.; Silimbani P.; Gallegati D.; Petracci E.; Schirone A.; Altini M.; Masini C.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/966563
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact