Background: Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with platinum-based chemotherapy (PlatinumCT) or with another ICI in the first-line setting for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have mixed results. Methods: Records were searched electronically from January 2019 to January 2024. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR). Results: Immune-based combinations were associated with an OS (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.92; p < 0.001; I2= 84.1%) and PFS benefit in the intention-to-treat population (HR: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.51-0.89; p < 0.001; I2 = 89.7%). There was no ORR improvement with immune-based combinations (HR: 1.36; 95% CI:0.84-2.20; p < 0.001; I2 = 92.6%). Conclusion: This systematic review and study-level meta-analysis demonstrated that the immune-based combinations in first-line treatment for patients with mUC are associated with survival benefit.

Monteiro, F.S.M., Soares, A., Mollica, V., Leite, C.A., Dias Carneiro, A.P.C., Rizzo, A., et al. (2024). Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combinations as First-Line Systemic Treatment in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 1, 1-36 [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104321].

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combinations as First-Line Systemic Treatment in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Mollica, Veronica;Massari, Francesco
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Background: Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with platinum-based chemotherapy (PlatinumCT) or with another ICI in the first-line setting for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have mixed results. Methods: Records were searched electronically from January 2019 to January 2024. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR). Results: Immune-based combinations were associated with an OS (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.92; p < 0.001; I2= 84.1%) and PFS benefit in the intention-to-treat population (HR: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.51-0.89; p < 0.001; I2 = 89.7%). There was no ORR improvement with immune-based combinations (HR: 1.36; 95% CI:0.84-2.20; p < 0.001; I2 = 92.6%). Conclusion: This systematic review and study-level meta-analysis demonstrated that the immune-based combinations in first-line treatment for patients with mUC are associated with survival benefit.
2024
Monteiro, F.S.M., Soares, A., Mollica, V., Leite, C.A., Dias Carneiro, A.P.C., Rizzo, A., et al. (2024). Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combinations as First-Line Systemic Treatment in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 1, 1-36 [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104321].
Monteiro, Fernando Sabino Marques; Soares, Andrey; Mollica, Veronica; Leite, Caio Abner; Dias Carneiro, Andre Paterno Castello; Rizzo, Alessandro; Bou...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/965933
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact