Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different lithium-disilicate (LiSi) glass-ceramic surface decontamination procedures on the shear bond strength (SBS) to resin cement. Materials and methods: Seventy CAD/CAM LiSi ceramic specimens (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were cut and sintered. Fifty specimens were treated with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20 s, while 20 were left untreated. All 70 specimens were then contaminated with human saliva and try-in silicone paste. The following surface cleaning methods were investigated (n = 10): C: water rinsing (control); PA: 37% H3PO4 etching for 20 s; E: 70% ethanol applied for 20 s; CP: cleaning paste (Ivoclean, Ivoclar) brushed for 20 s; HFSEP: self-etching ceramic primer (Monobond Etch&Prime, Ivoclar) rubbed for 20 s; HF: 5% HF applied for 20 s or no HF etching prior to contamination; SEP: self-etching ceramic primer rubbed for 20 s and no HF etching prior to contamination. Composite cylinders were created and luted with an adhesive resin cement to the decontaminated surfaces. After storage for 24 h at 37°C, the SBS test was conducted. Two fractured specimens per group were observed under SEM to perform fractographic analysis. The data were statistically analyzed with p set at <0.05. Results: The type of surface cleaning approach influenced bond strength (p < 0.001). HFSEP, SEP, and HF attained higher SBS (p < 0.001) compared to other groups. None of the approaches were able to completely remove contaminants from the ceramic surfaces. SEM images showed residual traces of contaminants on CP-treated surfaces. Conclusions: The self-etching ceramic primer enhanced bond strength to contaminated LiSi ceramic surfaces, irrespective of previous treatment with hydrofluoric acid.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different lithium disilicate (LiSi) glass-ceramic surface decontamination procedures on the shear bond strength (SBS) to resin cement. Materials and Methods: Seventy CAD/CAM LiSi ceramic specimens (IPS e.max CAD – Ivoclar) were cut and sintered. Fifty specimens were treated by 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20s, while 20 were left untreated. All 70 specimens were then contaminated with human saliva and try-in silicone paste. The following surface cleaning methods were investigated (n=10): G1) water rinsing (control, C); G2) 37% H3PO4 etching for 20s (PA); G3) 70% ethanol applied for 20s (E); G4) Ivoclean (Ivoclar) brushed for 20s (IVO); G5) Monobond Etch&Prime rubbed for 20s (MEPHF); G6) 5% hydrofluoric acid applied for 20s (HF)-no HF etching prior to contamination; G7) MEP rubbed for 20s (MEP)-no HF etching prior to contamination. Composite cylinders were created and luted with an adhesive resin cement to the decontaminated surfaces. After storage for 24 h at 37 °C the SBS test was conducted. Two fractured specimens per group were observed under SEM to perform fractographic analysis. Data were statistically analyzed (p<0.05). Results: The type of surface cleaning approach influenced bond strength (P<0.001). MEPHF, MEP and HF attained higher SBS (P<0.001) compared to other groups. None of the approaches were able to completely remove contaminants from the ceramic surfaces. SEM images showed residual traces of contaminants on the IVO-treated surfaces. Conclusions: The self-etch ceramic primer was able to enhance bond strength to contaminated LiSi ceramic surfaces, irrespective the previous treatment with hydrofluoric acid.

Del Bianco F, M.C. (2024). Bond Strength to Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic after Different Surface Cleaning Approaches. THE JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 26(1), 11-18 [10.3290/j.jad.b4874329].

Bond Strength to Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic after Different Surface Cleaning Approaches

Del Bianco F
Primo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Mazzitelli C
Secondo
;
Maravic T;Josic U;Florenzano F;Baldissara P;Breschi L
Penultimo
;
Mazzoni A.
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different lithium disilicate (LiSi) glass-ceramic surface decontamination procedures on the shear bond strength (SBS) to resin cement. Materials and Methods: Seventy CAD/CAM LiSi ceramic specimens (IPS e.max CAD – Ivoclar) were cut and sintered. Fifty specimens were treated by 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20s, while 20 were left untreated. All 70 specimens were then contaminated with human saliva and try-in silicone paste. The following surface cleaning methods were investigated (n=10): G1) water rinsing (control, C); G2) 37% H3PO4 etching for 20s (PA); G3) 70% ethanol applied for 20s (E); G4) Ivoclean (Ivoclar) brushed for 20s (IVO); G5) Monobond Etch&Prime rubbed for 20s (MEPHF); G6) 5% hydrofluoric acid applied for 20s (HF)-no HF etching prior to contamination; G7) MEP rubbed for 20s (MEP)-no HF etching prior to contamination. Composite cylinders were created and luted with an adhesive resin cement to the decontaminated surfaces. After storage for 24 h at 37 °C the SBS test was conducted. Two fractured specimens per group were observed under SEM to perform fractographic analysis. Data were statistically analyzed (p<0.05). Results: The type of surface cleaning approach influenced bond strength (P<0.001). MEPHF, MEP and HF attained higher SBS (P<0.001) compared to other groups. None of the approaches were able to completely remove contaminants from the ceramic surfaces. SEM images showed residual traces of contaminants on the IVO-treated surfaces. Conclusions: The self-etch ceramic primer was able to enhance bond strength to contaminated LiSi ceramic surfaces, irrespective the previous treatment with hydrofluoric acid.
2024
Del Bianco F, M.C. (2024). Bond Strength to Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic after Different Surface Cleaning Approaches. THE JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 26(1), 11-18 [10.3290/j.jad.b4874329].
Del Bianco F, Mazzitelli C, Maravic T, Josic U, Florenzano F, Baldissara P, Breschi L, Mazzoni A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jad_2024_s0011_del-bianco_b4874329.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 624.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
624.4 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/962975
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact