AimsThe Raunki AE r's system classifies vascular plants into life forms based on the position of renewal buds during periods unfavourable for plant growth. Despite the importance of Raunki AE r's system for ecological research, a study exploring the diversity and distribution of life forms on a continental scale is missing. We aim to (i) map the diversity and distribution of life forms in European vegetation and (ii) test for effects of bioclimatic variables while controlling for habitat-specific responses.LocationEurope.MethodsWe used data on life forms of 8883 species recorded in 546,501 vegetation plots of different habitats (forest, grassland, scrub and wetland). For each plot, we calculated: (i) the proportion of species of each life form and (ii) the richness and evenness of life forms. We mapped these plot-level metrics averaged across 50 km x 50 km grid cells and modelled their response to bioclimatic variables.ResultsHemicryptophytes were the most widespread life form, especially in the temperate zone of Central Europe. Conversely, therophyte and chamaephyte species were more common in the Mediterranean as well as in the dry temperate regions. Moreover, chamaephytes were also more common in the boreal and arctic zones. Higher proportions of phanerophytes were found in the Mediterranean. Overall, a higher richness of life forms was found at lower latitudes while evenness showed more spatially heterogeneous patterns. Habitat type was the main discriminator for most of the responses analysed, but several moisture-related predictors still showed a marked effect on the diversity of therophytes and chamaephytes.ConclusionsOur maps can be used as a tool for future biogeographic and macro-ecological research at a continental scale. Habitat type and bioclimatic conditions are key for regulating the diversity and distribution of plant life forms, with concomitant consequences for the response of functional diversity in European vegetation to global environmental changes.We analysed the diversity and distribution of plant life forms across Europe. Hemicryptophytes dominate in central Europe, while therophytes and chamaephytes thrive in the Mediterranean and dry temperate regions, and chamaephytes also in northern Europe. Habitat type strongly influences these patterns and moisture-related predictors impact therophyte and chamaephyte diversity.image

Diversity and distribution of Raunkiær's life forms in European vegetation / Midolo G.; Axmanová I.; Divíšek J.; Dřevojan P.; Lososová Z.; Večeřa M.; Karger D.N.; Thuiller W.; Bruelheide H.; Aćić S.; Attorre F.; Biurrun I.; Boch S.; Bonari G.; Čarni A.; Chiarucci A.; Ćušterevska R.; Dengler J.; Dziuba T.; Garbolino E.; Jandt U.; Lenoir J.; Marcenò C.; Rūsiņa S.; Šibík J.; Škvorc Ž.; Stančić Z.; Stanišić-Vujačić M.; Svenning J.C.; Swacha G.; Vassilev K.; Chytrý M.. - In: JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE. - ISSN 1100-9233. - ELETTRONICO. - 35:1(2024), pp. e13229.1-e13229.15. [10.1111/jvs.13229]

Diversity and distribution of Raunkiær's life forms in European vegetation

Chiarucci A.;Marcenò C.;
2024

Abstract

AimsThe Raunki AE r's system classifies vascular plants into life forms based on the position of renewal buds during periods unfavourable for plant growth. Despite the importance of Raunki AE r's system for ecological research, a study exploring the diversity and distribution of life forms on a continental scale is missing. We aim to (i) map the diversity and distribution of life forms in European vegetation and (ii) test for effects of bioclimatic variables while controlling for habitat-specific responses.LocationEurope.MethodsWe used data on life forms of 8883 species recorded in 546,501 vegetation plots of different habitats (forest, grassland, scrub and wetland). For each plot, we calculated: (i) the proportion of species of each life form and (ii) the richness and evenness of life forms. We mapped these plot-level metrics averaged across 50 km x 50 km grid cells and modelled their response to bioclimatic variables.ResultsHemicryptophytes were the most widespread life form, especially in the temperate zone of Central Europe. Conversely, therophyte and chamaephyte species were more common in the Mediterranean as well as in the dry temperate regions. Moreover, chamaephytes were also more common in the boreal and arctic zones. Higher proportions of phanerophytes were found in the Mediterranean. Overall, a higher richness of life forms was found at lower latitudes while evenness showed more spatially heterogeneous patterns. Habitat type was the main discriminator for most of the responses analysed, but several moisture-related predictors still showed a marked effect on the diversity of therophytes and chamaephytes.ConclusionsOur maps can be used as a tool for future biogeographic and macro-ecological research at a continental scale. Habitat type and bioclimatic conditions are key for regulating the diversity and distribution of plant life forms, with concomitant consequences for the response of functional diversity in European vegetation to global environmental changes.We analysed the diversity and distribution of plant life forms across Europe. Hemicryptophytes dominate in central Europe, while therophytes and chamaephytes thrive in the Mediterranean and dry temperate regions, and chamaephytes also in northern Europe. Habitat type strongly influences these patterns and moisture-related predictors impact therophyte and chamaephyte diversity.image
2024
Diversity and distribution of Raunkiær's life forms in European vegetation / Midolo G.; Axmanová I.; Divíšek J.; Dřevojan P.; Lososová Z.; Večeřa M.; Karger D.N.; Thuiller W.; Bruelheide H.; Aćić S.; Attorre F.; Biurrun I.; Boch S.; Bonari G.; Čarni A.; Chiarucci A.; Ćušterevska R.; Dengler J.; Dziuba T.; Garbolino E.; Jandt U.; Lenoir J.; Marcenò C.; Rūsiņa S.; Šibík J.; Škvorc Ž.; Stančić Z.; Stanišić-Vujačić M.; Svenning J.C.; Swacha G.; Vassilev K.; Chytrý M.. - In: JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE. - ISSN 1100-9233. - ELETTRONICO. - 35:1(2024), pp. e13229.1-e13229.15. [10.1111/jvs.13229]
Midolo G.; Axmanová I.; Divíšek J.; Dřevojan P.; Lososová Z.; Večeřa M.; Karger D.N.; Thuiller W.; Bruelheide H.; Aćić S.; Attorre F.; Biurrun I.; Boch S.; Bonari G.; Čarni A.; Chiarucci A.; Ćušterevska R.; Dengler J.; Dziuba T.; Garbolino E.; Jandt U.; Lenoir J.; Marcenò C.; Rūsiņa S.; Šibík J.; Škvorc Ž.; Stančić Z.; Stanišić-Vujačić M.; Svenning J.C.; Swacha G.; Vassilev K.; Chytrý M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Midolo et al. - 2024 - Diversity and distribution of Raunkiær's life form.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 7.02 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.02 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/961073
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact