Although apparently irreconcilable, the positions of Natorp and Heidegger do not fail to show some significant points of contact regarding the problem of an access to subjectivity. If the «I», for the Natorp of the Allgemeine Psychologie, eludes any intuitive grasp, for the Heidegger of the first Fribourg courses, ipseity can only be given at the price of a tension – a tension that would leave unresolved the problematic nature of the relationship between «I», facticity and existence.
Emanuele Mariani (2024). In che senso esiste chi esiste? Heidegger e Natorp a confronto. GIORNALE CRITICO DELLA FILOSOFIA ITALIANA, 103(20-1), 168-190.
In che senso esiste chi esiste? Heidegger e Natorp a confronto
Emanuele Mariani
2024
Abstract
Although apparently irreconcilable, the positions of Natorp and Heidegger do not fail to show some significant points of contact regarding the problem of an access to subjectivity. If the «I», for the Natorp of the Allgemeine Psychologie, eludes any intuitive grasp, for the Heidegger of the first Fribourg courses, ipseity can only be given at the price of a tension – a tension that would leave unresolved the problematic nature of the relationship between «I», facticity and existence.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
MARIANI_estratto GCFI 1-2024 (1).pdf
embargo fino al 31/12/2024
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione
263.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
263.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.