Background. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the patient-reported outcome after immediate ADM-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction. Material and Methods: Patients underwent breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2019 have been retrospectively divided into group A (partial subpectoral implant and ADM and group B (expander/implant). For each patient we evaluated retrospectively postoperative complications and patients’ satisfaction. Results: 26 patients from the case group and 40 from the control group completed the BREAST-Q. The incidence of complications in the cases was 18.4%, while in the control group was 20.4%. We found no statistical difference in most of the domains and in the mean score of the questionnaire (mean score cases=69.0±14.4 vs con-trols=68.4±15.7; p=0.888). A significant difference results only in the domains Q2a and Q2b, sensation of rippling. Conclusions: The use of ADM in one-stage reconstruction allows to perform breast reconstruction in only one surgery, with similar complication rates and patient satisfaction. (www.actabiomedica.it).

Innocenti A., Melita D., Affortunati M., Susini T., Innocenti M. (2021). Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Analysis of patients’ satisfaction. ACTA BIO-MEDICA DE L'ATENEO PARMENSE, 92, 1-6 [10.23750/abm.v92i3.9916].

Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Analysis of patients’ satisfaction

Innocenti M.
2021

Abstract

Background. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the patient-reported outcome after immediate ADM-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction. Material and Methods: Patients underwent breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2019 have been retrospectively divided into group A (partial subpectoral implant and ADM and group B (expander/implant). For each patient we evaluated retrospectively postoperative complications and patients’ satisfaction. Results: 26 patients from the case group and 40 from the control group completed the BREAST-Q. The incidence of complications in the cases was 18.4%, while in the control group was 20.4%. We found no statistical difference in most of the domains and in the mean score of the questionnaire (mean score cases=69.0±14.4 vs con-trols=68.4±15.7; p=0.888). A significant difference results only in the domains Q2a and Q2b, sensation of rippling. Conclusions: The use of ADM in one-stage reconstruction allows to perform breast reconstruction in only one surgery, with similar complication rates and patient satisfaction. (www.actabiomedica.it).
2021
Innocenti A., Melita D., Affortunati M., Susini T., Innocenti M. (2021). Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Analysis of patients’ satisfaction. ACTA BIO-MEDICA DE L'ATENEO PARMENSE, 92, 1-6 [10.23750/abm.v92i3.9916].
Innocenti A.; Melita D.; Affortunati M.; Susini T.; Innocenti M.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/959451
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact