Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CRIS Current Research Information System
Introduction: The empty pelvis syndrome is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration surgery. It remains poorly defined with research in this field being heterogeneous and of low quality. Furthermore, there has been minimal engagement with patient representatives following pelvic exenteration with respect to the empty pelvic syndrome. 'PelvEx-Beating the empty pelvis syndrome' aims to engage both patient representatives and healthcare professionals to achieve an international consensus on a core outcome set, pathophysiology and mitigation of the empty pelvis syndrome. Methods and analysis: A modified-Delphi approach will be followed with a three-stage study design. First, statements will be longlisted using a recent systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient and public engagement, and Delphi piloting. Second, statements will be shortlisted using up to three rounds of online modified Delphi. Third, statements will be confirmed and instruments for measurable statements selected using a virtual patient-representative consensus meeting, and finally a face-to-face healthcare professional consensus meeting. Ethics and dissemination: The University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine ethics committee has approved this protocol, which is registered as a study with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. Publication of this study will increase the potential for comparative research to further understanding and prevent the empty pelvis syndrome. Trial registration number: NCT05683795.
C T West, M.A.W. (2024). Beating the empty pelvis syndrome: the PelvEx Collaborative core outcome set study protocol. BMJ OPEN, pub ahead of print, 1-6 [10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076538].
Beating the empty pelvis syndrome: the PelvEx Collaborative core outcome set study protocol
C T West;M A West;I Drami;A Denys;T Glyn;P A Sutton;J Tiernan;C Behrenbruch;G Guerra;P S Waters;N Woodward;S Applin;S J Charles;S A Rose;E Pape;G H van Ramshorst;A H Mirnezami;Agj Aalbers;N Abdul Aziz;N Abecasis;M Abraham-Nordling;T Akiyoshi;R Alahmadi;W Alberda;M Albert;M Andric;M Angeles;E Angenete;A Antoniou;J Armitage;R Auer;K K Austin;E Aytac;O Aziz;N Bacalbasa;R P Baker;M Bali;S Baransi;G Baseckas;B Bebington;M Bedford;B K Bednarski;G L Beets;P L Berg;C Bergzoll;J Beynon;S Biondo;K Boyle;L Bordeianou;E Brecelj;A B Bremers;K Brown;M Brunner;P Buchwald;A Bui;A Burgess;Jwa Burger;D Burling;E Burns;N Campain;S Carvalhal;L Castro;A Caycedo-Marulanda;W Ceelen;Kkl Chan;G J Chang;M H Chew;A K Chok;P Chong;H K Christensen;H Clouston;D Collins;A J Colquhoun;J Constantinides;A Corr;M Coscia;M Cosimelli;C Cotsoglou;P E Coyne;R S Croner;L Damjanovic;I R Daniels;M Davies;R J Davies;C P Delaney;Jhw de Wilt;Q D Denost;C Deutsch;D Dietz;S Domingo;E J Dozois;E Drozdov;M Duff;E Egger;T Eglinton;J M Enrique-Navascues;E Espín-Basany;M D Evans;B Eyjólfsdóttir;M Fahy;N S Fearnhead;S Fichtner-Feigl;K Flatmark;F Fleming;B Flor;J Folkesson;K Foskett;F A Frizelle;J Funder;M A Gallego;E García-Granero;J L García-Sabrido;M Gargiulo;V G Gava;L Gentilini;M L George;V George;P Georgiou;A Ghosh;L Ghouti;A Gil-Moreno;F Giner;N Ginther;T Glover;P Goffredo;T Golda;C M Gomez;B Griffiths;F Gwenaël;C Harris;D A Harris;Jaw Hagemans;V Hanchanale;D P Harji;C Helbren;R M Helewa;G Hellawell;A G Heriot;D Hochman;W Hohenberger;T Holm;A Holmström;R Hompes;B Hornung;S Hurton;E Hyun;M Ito;L H Iversen;J T Jenkins;K Jourand;S Kaffenberger;G V Kandaswamy;S Kapur;Y Kanemitsu;M Kaufman;M Kazi;S R Kelley;D S Keller;M E Kelly;S Kersting;Shj Ketelaers;M S Khan;J Khaw;H Kim;H J Kim;R Kiran;C E Koh;Kok Nfm;R Kokelaar;C Kontovounisios;F Kose;M Koutra;M Kraft;Kristensen Hø;S Kumar;M Kusters;V Lago;Z Lakkis;B Lampe;M C Langheinrich;T Larach;S G Larsen;D W Larson;W L Law;S Laurberg;P J Lee;M Limbert;A Loria;M L Lydrup;A Lyons;A C Lynch;M Mackintosh;C Mann;C Mantyh;K L Mathis;Cfs Margues;A Martinez;A Martling;Meijerink Wjhj;A Merchea;S Merkel;A M Mehta;D R McArthur;J J McCormick;F D McDermott;J S McGrath;A McPhee;J Maciel;S Malde;S Manfredelli;S Mikalauskas;D Modest;Jrt Monson;J R Morton;T G Mullaney;A S Navarro;H Neeff;I Negoi;Jwm Neto;B Nguyen;M B Nielsen;Gap Nieuwenhuijzen;P J Nilsson;S Nordkamp;S T O'Dwyer;K Paarnio;G Palmer;E Pappou;J Park;D Patsouras;A Peacock;G Pellino;A C Peterson;F Pfeffer;F Piqeur;J Pinson;G Poggioli;D Proud;M Quinn;A Oliver;A Quyn;R W Radwan;N Rajendran;C Rao;S Rasheed;P C Rasmussen;E Rausa;S E Regenbogen;H M Reims;A Renehan;J Rintala;R Rocha;M Rochester;J Rohila;J Rothbarth;M Rottoli;C Roxburgh;Hjt Rutten;B Safar;P M Sagar;A Sahai;A Saklani;T Sammour;R Sayyed;Amp Schizas;E Schwarzkopf;D Scripcariu;V Scripcariu;G Seifert;C Selvasekar;M Shaban;I Shaikh;D Shida;A Simpson;T Skeie-Jensen;N J Smart;P Smart;J J Smith;T Smith;A M Solbakken;M J Solomon;M M Sørensen;M Spasojevic;S R Steele;D Steffens;K Stitzenberg;L Stocchi;N A Stylianides;T Swartling;H Sumrien;T Swartking;H Takala;E J Tan;C Taylor;D Taylor;P Tejedor;A Tekin;P P Tekkis;J Teras;M R Thanapal;H V Thaysen;E Thorgersen;R Thurairaja;E L Toh;P Tsarkov;J Tolenaar;Y Tsukada;S Tsukamoto;J J Tuech;G Turner;W H Turner;J B Tuynman;M Valente;J van Rees;D van Zoggel;W Vásquez-Jiménez;C Verhoef;M Vierimaa;G Vizzielli;Elk Voogt;K Uehara;C Wakeman;S Warrier;H H Wasmuth;K Weber;M R Weiser;O L Westney;Jmd Wheeler;J Wild;M Wilson;A Wolthuis;H Yano;B Yip;J Yip;R N Yoo;M A Zappa;D C Winter
2024
Abstract
Introduction: The empty pelvis syndrome is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration surgery. It remains poorly defined with research in this field being heterogeneous and of low quality. Furthermore, there has been minimal engagement with patient representatives following pelvic exenteration with respect to the empty pelvic syndrome. 'PelvEx-Beating the empty pelvis syndrome' aims to engage both patient representatives and healthcare professionals to achieve an international consensus on a core outcome set, pathophysiology and mitigation of the empty pelvis syndrome. Methods and analysis: A modified-Delphi approach will be followed with a three-stage study design. First, statements will be longlisted using a recent systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient and public engagement, and Delphi piloting. Second, statements will be shortlisted using up to three rounds of online modified Delphi. Third, statements will be confirmed and instruments for measurable statements selected using a virtual patient-representative consensus meeting, and finally a face-to-face healthcare professional consensus meeting. Ethics and dissemination: The University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine ethics committee has approved this protocol, which is registered as a study with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. Publication of this study will increase the potential for comparative research to further understanding and prevent the empty pelvis syndrome. Trial registration number: NCT05683795.
C T West, M.A.W. (2024). Beating the empty pelvis syndrome: the PelvEx Collaborative core outcome set study protocol. BMJ OPEN, pub ahead of print, 1-6 [10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076538].
C T West, M A West, I Drami, A Denys, T Glyn, P A Sutton, J Tiernan, C Behrenbruch, G Guerra, P S Waters, N Woodward, S Applin, S J Charles, S A Rose,...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/958268
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
1
2
2
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.