The purpose of the systematic review was to synthesize the literature on children’s outcomes across different living arrangements (nuclear families, shared physical custody [SPC], lone physical custody [LPC]) by extracting and structuring relevant theoretical hypotheses (selection, instability, fewer resources, and stressful mobility) and comparing the empirical findings against these hypotheses. Following the PRISMA guidelines, the review included 39 studies conducted between January 2010-December 2022 and compared the living arrangements across five domains of children’s outcomes: emotional, behavioral, relational, physical, and educational. The results showed that children’s outcomes were the best in nuclear families but in 75% of the studies children in SPC arrangements had equal outcomes. Children in LPC tended to report the worst outcomes. When compared with the different theoretical hypotheses, the results were the most consistent with fewer resources hypothesis which suggests that children especially in LPC families have fewer relational and economic resources whereas children in SPC families are better able to maintain resources from both parents.

[Union dissolution and children outcomes.] Systematic Review of Post-Separation Living Arrangements and Children’s Outcomes / Vowels, L. M., Comolli, C. L., Bernardi, L., Chaco´n-Mendoza, D., Darwiche, J.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - ELETTRONICO. - 18:6 (June)(2023), pp. e0288112.1-e0288112.23. [10.1371/journal.pone.0288112]

[Union dissolution and children outcomes.] Systematic Review of Post-Separation Living Arrangements and Children’s Outcomes

Comolli C. L.;
2023

Abstract

The purpose of the systematic review was to synthesize the literature on children’s outcomes across different living arrangements (nuclear families, shared physical custody [SPC], lone physical custody [LPC]) by extracting and structuring relevant theoretical hypotheses (selection, instability, fewer resources, and stressful mobility) and comparing the empirical findings against these hypotheses. Following the PRISMA guidelines, the review included 39 studies conducted between January 2010-December 2022 and compared the living arrangements across five domains of children’s outcomes: emotional, behavioral, relational, physical, and educational. The results showed that children’s outcomes were the best in nuclear families but in 75% of the studies children in SPC arrangements had equal outcomes. Children in LPC tended to report the worst outcomes. When compared with the different theoretical hypotheses, the results were the most consistent with fewer resources hypothesis which suggests that children especially in LPC families have fewer relational and economic resources whereas children in SPC families are better able to maintain resources from both parents.
2023
[Union dissolution and children outcomes.] Systematic Review of Post-Separation Living Arrangements and Children’s Outcomes / Vowels, L. M., Comolli, C. L., Bernardi, L., Chaco´n-Mendoza, D., Darwiche, J.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - ELETTRONICO. - 18:6 (June)(2023), pp. e0288112.1-e0288112.23. [10.1371/journal.pone.0288112]
Vowels, L. M., Comolli, C. L., Bernardi, L., Chaco´n-Mendoza, D., Darwiche, J.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
journal.pone.0288112 (2).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 881.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
881.34 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/955770
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact