Threat learning in space: how stimulus-outcome spatial compatibility modulates conditioned skin conductance response

A central question in Pavlovian conditioning concerns the critical conditions that drive the acquisition and maintenance of the stimulus-outcome association. The spatial relationship between the conditioned (CS) and unconditioned (US) stimuli is considered to exert strong effects on learning. However, how spatial information modulates Pavlovian learning remains mostly unexplored in humans. Here, we test how the compatibility be-tween the CS and the US location influences the acquisition, extinction, and recovery (following reinstatement) of Pavlovian conditioned threat. Participants (N = 20) completed a differential threat conditioning task in which visual CSs appeared on the same (compatible) or opposite (incompatible) hemispace as the US delivery (aversive shock to one hand), while their skin conductance response served as an index of learning. Results show that initial threat expectations were biased in favor of compatible CSs before conditioning. Nevertheless, this bias was revised during acquisition to reflect current stimulus-outcome contingencies. Computational modeling suggested that this effect occurred through a higher reliance on positive aversive prediction errors for incompatible CSs, thereby facilitating learning of their association with the US. Additionally, the conditioned response to incom-patible CSs was associated with initially slower extinction and a greater recovery after threat reinstatement. These findings suggest that spatial information conveyed by stimuli and outcomes can be flexibly used to enact defensive responses to the current source of danger, highlighting the adaptive nature of Pavlovian learning.