Scholarship on regulating global finance emphasizes the importance of national and bureaucratic interests, but less attention has been devoted to epistemic sources of regulatory conflict. We address this by analyzing the failure of regulators to agree tougher rules for large investment funds after the 2008 crisis. The article suggests this outcome was the result of epistemic contestation between prudential regulators and securities regulators, rooted in divergent interpretive "frames." We show that US and EU prudential regulators pushed for entity-based regulation of investment funds by escalating the issue to global standard-setting bodies. But this was successfully resisted by securities regulators that exercised epistemic authority through recursive practices-appeals to expertise, jurisdictional claims, and alliance building-to defend their transaction-based approach. The article demonstrates how an interpretivist perspective can provide new insights into inter-agency conflict and regulatory disputes in other policy fields.

Epistemic contestation and interagency conflict: The challenge of regulating investment funds / James S.; Quaglia L.. - In: REGULATION & GOVERNANCE. - ISSN 1748-5991. - ELETTRONICO. - 17:2(2023), pp. 346-362. [10.1111/rego.12457]

Epistemic contestation and interagency conflict: The challenge of regulating investment funds

Quaglia L.
2023

Abstract

Scholarship on regulating global finance emphasizes the importance of national and bureaucratic interests, but less attention has been devoted to epistemic sources of regulatory conflict. We address this by analyzing the failure of regulators to agree tougher rules for large investment funds after the 2008 crisis. The article suggests this outcome was the result of epistemic contestation between prudential regulators and securities regulators, rooted in divergent interpretive "frames." We show that US and EU prudential regulators pushed for entity-based regulation of investment funds by escalating the issue to global standard-setting bodies. But this was successfully resisted by securities regulators that exercised epistemic authority through recursive practices-appeals to expertise, jurisdictional claims, and alliance building-to defend their transaction-based approach. The article demonstrates how an interpretivist perspective can provide new insights into inter-agency conflict and regulatory disputes in other policy fields.
2023
Epistemic contestation and interagency conflict: The challenge of regulating investment funds / James S.; Quaglia L.. - In: REGULATION & GOVERNANCE. - ISSN 1748-5991. - ELETTRONICO. - 17:2(2023), pp. 346-362. [10.1111/rego.12457]
James S.; Quaglia L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Epistemic contestation and interagency conflict.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 283.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
283.26 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/954489
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact