Loss of chondroprotection of medial collagen meniscus implant (CMI) at 20-year follow-up

Objective: The mid-term results of the collagen meniscus implant (CMI) procedure for the replacement of partial meniscus defects have already been described. However, there is a paucity of long-term comparative studies. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, failures, and osteoarthritis progression of patients who underwent partial medial meniscectomy and medial CMI implantation. Methods: Thirty-six nonconsecutive patients with medial meniscus injuries that underwent medial CMI (MCMI) implantation or partial medial meniscectomy (PMM) between 1997 and 2000 were included in a prospective study with an intermediate 10-year follow-up examination and a final follow-up examination at 20-year follow-up. Outcome measures at the 20-year follow-up included the Lysholm score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee form , and Tegner activity level. Bilateral weight-bearing radiographs were also performed to evaluate hip-knee-angle (HKA) and the medial joint line height (JL). Data regarding complications and failures were also collected. Results: At the 20-year follow-up, 31 patients (83% follow-up rate) with a mean age of 60.7 ​± ​8.9 years were included in the final analysis (21.1 ​± ​1.2 years follow-up). Four reoperations and one failure per group were reported. When comparing the clinical results of the two groups, no difference was found considering the Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner, and the IKDC. Moreover, 20 patients underwent radiographic examination (10 MCMI, 10 ​MM), and no statistically significant difference was reported concerning the JL, HKA, and the presence and incidence of osteoarthritis between the two groups. Conclusion: The CMI implant for partial medial meniscectomy provided good long-term results and a low failure rate. However, differently from the 10 years follow-up, the clinical and the radiological outcomes were not superior compared to the medial meniscectomy group. The present study's result suggests that using a medial scaffold is not chondroprotective. Level of evidence: III, Prospective case-control study.