Regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs (RESE) in managing negative emotions and in expressing positive emotions are believed to play an important role in different spheres of psychological functioning. However, the literature does not offer a quantitative synthesis of the degree of the relation between RESE and indices of (mal)adjustment. The present study is a meta-analytic investigation of the relation between RESE and indices of maladjustment and adjustment. A total of 93 studies from 83 peer-reviewed international articles and 1 doctoral dissertation were included, for a total amount of 48,373 participants. RESE were negatively and significantly related to maladjustment (r = -.24). Conversely, RESE were positively and significantly related to adjustment (r =.35). Results seem not to be affected by publication bias and only a few moderating effects were documented. In conclusion, given the above results, RESE proved to be (among others) a valid marker of overall psychosocial functioning, both in its positive and negative facets.

Alessandri G., Tavolucci S., Perinelli E., Eisenberg N., Golfieri F., Caprara G.V., et al. (2023). Regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs matter for (mal)adjustment: A meta-analysis. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 42(35), 31004-31023 [10.1007/s12144-022-04099-3].

Regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs matter for (mal)adjustment: A meta-analysis

Golfieri F.;Crocetti E.
2023

Abstract

Regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs (RESE) in managing negative emotions and in expressing positive emotions are believed to play an important role in different spheres of psychological functioning. However, the literature does not offer a quantitative synthesis of the degree of the relation between RESE and indices of (mal)adjustment. The present study is a meta-analytic investigation of the relation between RESE and indices of maladjustment and adjustment. A total of 93 studies from 83 peer-reviewed international articles and 1 doctoral dissertation were included, for a total amount of 48,373 participants. RESE were negatively and significantly related to maladjustment (r = -.24). Conversely, RESE were positively and significantly related to adjustment (r =.35). Results seem not to be affected by publication bias and only a few moderating effects were documented. In conclusion, given the above results, RESE proved to be (among others) a valid marker of overall psychosocial functioning, both in its positive and negative facets.
2023
Alessandri G., Tavolucci S., Perinelli E., Eisenberg N., Golfieri F., Caprara G.V., et al. (2023). Regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs matter for (mal)adjustment: A meta-analysis. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 42(35), 31004-31023 [10.1007/s12144-022-04099-3].
Alessandri G.; Tavolucci S.; Perinelli E.; Eisenberg N.; Golfieri F.; Caprara G.V.; Crocetti E.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs matter for.pdf

Open Access dal 15/12/2023

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 773.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
773.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
12144_2022_4099_MOESM1_ESM(1).docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 71.09 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
71.09 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/953850
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact