Background: Physical prehabilitation is recommended before major abdominal surgery to ameliorate short-term outcomes. Methods: A frequentist, random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to clarify which type of preoperative physical activity among aerobic exercise (AE), inspiratory muscle training (IMT), and resistance training produces benefits in patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. The surface under the P-score, odds ratio (OR), or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. The results were adjusted by using the component network approach. The critical endpoints were overall and major morbidity rate and mortality rate. The important but not critical endpoints were the length of stay (LOS) and pneumonia. Results: The meta-analysis included 25 studies. The best approaches for overall morbidity rate were AE and AE + IMT (OR = 0.61, p-score = 0.76, and OR = 0.66, p-score = 0.68). The best approaches for pneumonia were AE + IMT and AE (OR = 0.21, p-score = 0.91, and OR = 0.52, p-score = 0.68). The component analysis confirmed that the best incremental OR (0.30; 95% CI 0.12–0.74) could be obtained using AE + IMT. The best approach for LOS was AE alone (MD − 1.63 days; 95% CI − 3.43 to 0.18). The best combination of components was AE + IMT (MD − 1.70; 95% CI − 2.06 to − 1.27). Conclusions: Physical prehabilitation reduces the overall morbidity rate, pneumonia, and length of stay. The most relevant effect of prehabilitation requires the simultaneous use of AE and IMT.

Physical Prehabilitation in Patients who Underwent Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis Using GRADE and CINeMA Approach / Ricci C.; Alberici L.; Serbassi F.; Caraceni P.; Domenicali M.; Ingaldi C.; Grego D.G.; Mazzucchelli C.; Casadei R.. - In: ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1068-9265. - ELETTRONICO. - 31:3(2024), pp. 1725-1738. [10.1245/s10434-023-14632-8]

Physical Prehabilitation in Patients who Underwent Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis Using GRADE and CINeMA Approach

Ricci C.;Alberici L.;Serbassi F.;Caraceni P.;Domenicali M.;Ingaldi C.;Grego D. G.;Mazzucchelli C.;Casadei R.
2024

Abstract

Background: Physical prehabilitation is recommended before major abdominal surgery to ameliorate short-term outcomes. Methods: A frequentist, random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to clarify which type of preoperative physical activity among aerobic exercise (AE), inspiratory muscle training (IMT), and resistance training produces benefits in patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. The surface under the P-score, odds ratio (OR), or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. The results were adjusted by using the component network approach. The critical endpoints were overall and major morbidity rate and mortality rate. The important but not critical endpoints were the length of stay (LOS) and pneumonia. Results: The meta-analysis included 25 studies. The best approaches for overall morbidity rate were AE and AE + IMT (OR = 0.61, p-score = 0.76, and OR = 0.66, p-score = 0.68). The best approaches for pneumonia were AE + IMT and AE (OR = 0.21, p-score = 0.91, and OR = 0.52, p-score = 0.68). The component analysis confirmed that the best incremental OR (0.30; 95% CI 0.12–0.74) could be obtained using AE + IMT. The best approach for LOS was AE alone (MD − 1.63 days; 95% CI − 3.43 to 0.18). The best combination of components was AE + IMT (MD − 1.70; 95% CI − 2.06 to − 1.27). Conclusions: Physical prehabilitation reduces the overall morbidity rate, pneumonia, and length of stay. The most relevant effect of prehabilitation requires the simultaneous use of AE and IMT.
2024
Physical Prehabilitation in Patients who Underwent Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis Using GRADE and CINeMA Approach / Ricci C.; Alberici L.; Serbassi F.; Caraceni P.; Domenicali M.; Ingaldi C.; Grego D.G.; Mazzucchelli C.; Casadei R.. - In: ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1068-9265. - ELETTRONICO. - 31:3(2024), pp. 1725-1738. [10.1245/s10434-023-14632-8]
Ricci C.; Alberici L.; Serbassi F.; Caraceni P.; Domenicali M.; Ingaldi C.; Grego D.G.; Mazzucchelli C.; Casadei R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ricci_ASO_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 642.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
642.14 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
10434_2023_14632_MOESM1_ESM.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 358.59 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
358.59 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/952194
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact