Context. The peculiar velocity distribution of cluster member galaxies provides a powerful tool to directly investigate the gravitational potentials within galaxy clusters and to test the gravity theory on megaparsec scales. Aims: We exploit spectroscopic galaxy and galaxy cluster samples extracted from the latest releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to derive new constraints on the gravity theory. Methods: We considered a spectroscopic sample of 3058 galaxy clusters, with a maximum redshift of 0.5 and masses between 1014 − 1015 M⊙. We analysed the velocity distribution of the cluster member galaxies to make new measurements of the gravitational redshift effect inside galaxy clusters. We accurately estimated the cluster centres, computing them as the average of angular positions and redshifts of the closest galaxies to the brightest cluster galaxies. We find that this centre definition provides a better estimation of the centre of the cluster gravitational potential wells, relative to simply assuming the brightest cluster galaxies as the cluster centres, as done in past literature works. We compared our measurements with the theoretical predictions of three different gravity theories: general relativity (GR), the f(R) model, and the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) model. A new statistical procedure was used to fit the measured gravitational redshift signal, and thus to discriminate among the considered gravity theories. Finally, we investigated the systematic uncertainties that possibly affect the analysis. Results: We clearly detect the gravitational redshift effect in the exploited cluster member catalogue. We recover an integrated gravitational redshift signal of −11.4 ± 3.3 km s−1, which is in agreement, within the errors, with past literature works. Conclusions: Overall, our results are consistent with both GR and DGP predictions, while they are in marginal disagreement with the predictions of the considered f(R) strong field model.
D. Rosselli, F. Marulli, A. Veropalumbo, A. Cimatti, L. Moscardini (2023). Testing general relativity: New measurements of gravitational redshift in galaxy clusters. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 669, 1-16 [10.1051/0004-6361/202244244].
Testing general relativity: New measurements of gravitational redshift in galaxy clusters
D. Rosselli;F. Marulli;A. Cimatti;L. Moscardini
2023
Abstract
Context. The peculiar velocity distribution of cluster member galaxies provides a powerful tool to directly investigate the gravitational potentials within galaxy clusters and to test the gravity theory on megaparsec scales. Aims: We exploit spectroscopic galaxy and galaxy cluster samples extracted from the latest releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to derive new constraints on the gravity theory. Methods: We considered a spectroscopic sample of 3058 galaxy clusters, with a maximum redshift of 0.5 and masses between 1014 − 1015 M⊙. We analysed the velocity distribution of the cluster member galaxies to make new measurements of the gravitational redshift effect inside galaxy clusters. We accurately estimated the cluster centres, computing them as the average of angular positions and redshifts of the closest galaxies to the brightest cluster galaxies. We find that this centre definition provides a better estimation of the centre of the cluster gravitational potential wells, relative to simply assuming the brightest cluster galaxies as the cluster centres, as done in past literature works. We compared our measurements with the theoretical predictions of three different gravity theories: general relativity (GR), the f(R) model, and the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) model. A new statistical procedure was used to fit the measured gravitational redshift signal, and thus to discriminate among the considered gravity theories. Finally, we investigated the systematic uncertainties that possibly affect the analysis. Results: We clearly detect the gravitational redshift effect in the exploited cluster member catalogue. We recover an integrated gravitational redshift signal of −11.4 ± 3.3 km s−1, which is in agreement, within the errors, with past literature works. Conclusions: Overall, our results are consistent with both GR and DGP predictions, while they are in marginal disagreement with the predictions of the considered f(R) strong field model.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
rosselli_2023.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.91 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.91 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.