Hegel and Rawls seem to be two scarcely compatible authors, the first being a critic of the social contract and of Kantian morality, the second being a neocontractualist and a reassertor of Kantian moral constructivism; the former being a speculative philosopher, the latter being an analytically trained philosopher. The first impression, however, can be misleading and the reading of Rawls’s works reveal an interest and a respect for Hegel as one would not have imagined: Hegel as a philosopher of reconciliation and the social rootedness of morality. With what reliability, on the theoretical and historical level, remains at least in part to be established.
Bonacina Giovanni (2021). Hegel e Rawls. DIANOIA, 26(33), 147-167 [10.53148/1113].
Hegel e Rawls
Bonacina Giovanni
2021
Abstract
Hegel and Rawls seem to be two scarcely compatible authors, the first being a critic of the social contract and of Kantian morality, the second being a neocontractualist and a reassertor of Kantian moral constructivism; the former being a speculative philosopher, the latter being an analytically trained philosopher. The first impression, however, can be misleading and the reading of Rawls’s works reveal an interest and a respect for Hegel as one would not have imagined: Hegel as a philosopher of reconciliation and the social rootedness of morality. With what reliability, on the theoretical and historical level, remains at least in part to be established.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Hegel_ e _Rawls.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione
254.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
254.16 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.