The published article by Howells et al. (2023) attempts to empirically derive the lateral footprint for a single cosmic-ray neutron sensor (CRNS), which is part of the COSMOS-UK network (Evans et al. 2016). The main result is the “true” footprint to be 50 m in radius, substantially smaller than previously published estimates. Their conclusion contradicts more than 15 peer-reviewed studies and more than a decade of research on the subject conducted by various international research groups, and thus, it would be considered as a ground-breaking finding if the methods were scientifically sound. However, the methods and arguments presented by the authors have major errors and the presented conclusions are consequently wrong.

Comment on ‘Examining the variation of soil moisture from cosmic‑ray neutron probes footprint: experimental results from a COSMOS‑UK site’ by Howells, O.D., Petropoulos, G.P., et al., Environ Earth Sci 82, 41 (2023) / Scheiffele L.M.; Schrön M.; Köhli M.; Dimitrova-Petrova K.; Altdorff D.; Franz T.; Rosolem R.; Evans J.; Blake J.; Bogena H.; McJannet D.; Baroni Gabriele; Desilets D.; Oswald S.E.. - In: ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES. - ISSN 1866-6280. - ELETTRONICO. - 82:20(2023), pp. 474.1-474.5. [10.1007/s12665-023-11186-6]

Comment on ‘Examining the variation of soil moisture from cosmic‑ray neutron probes footprint: experimental results from a COSMOS‑UK site’ by Howells, O.D., Petropoulos, G.P., et al., Environ Earth Sci 82, 41 (2023)

Baroni Gabriele;
2023

Abstract

The published article by Howells et al. (2023) attempts to empirically derive the lateral footprint for a single cosmic-ray neutron sensor (CRNS), which is part of the COSMOS-UK network (Evans et al. 2016). The main result is the “true” footprint to be 50 m in radius, substantially smaller than previously published estimates. Their conclusion contradicts more than 15 peer-reviewed studies and more than a decade of research on the subject conducted by various international research groups, and thus, it would be considered as a ground-breaking finding if the methods were scientifically sound. However, the methods and arguments presented by the authors have major errors and the presented conclusions are consequently wrong.
2023
Comment on ‘Examining the variation of soil moisture from cosmic‑ray neutron probes footprint: experimental results from a COSMOS‑UK site’ by Howells, O.D., Petropoulos, G.P., et al., Environ Earth Sci 82, 41 (2023) / Scheiffele L.M.; Schrön M.; Köhli M.; Dimitrova-Petrova K.; Altdorff D.; Franz T.; Rosolem R.; Evans J.; Blake J.; Bogena H.; McJannet D.; Baroni Gabriele; Desilets D.; Oswald S.E.. - In: ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES. - ISSN 1866-6280. - ELETTRONICO. - 82:20(2023), pp. 474.1-474.5. [10.1007/s12665-023-11186-6]
Scheiffele L.M.; Schrön M.; Köhli M.; Dimitrova-Petrova K.; Altdorff D.; Franz T.; Rosolem R.; Evans J.; Blake J.; Bogena H.; McJannet D.; Baroni Gabriele; Desilets D.; Oswald S.E.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s12665-023-11186-6.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 635.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
635.6 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/949522
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact