Study Objective: To estimate the incidence of infection after diagnostic and operative hysteroscopic procedures performed in an in-office setting with different distension media (saline solution or CO 2 ). Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: Tertiary women's health centers. Patients: A total of 42,934 women who underwent hysteroscopy between 2015 and 2017. Interventions: Of the 42,934 patients evaluated, 34,248 underwent a diagnostic intervention and 8686 underwent an operative intervention; 17,973 procedures used CO 2 and 24,961 used saline solution as a distension medium. Patients were contacted after the procedure to record postprocedure symptoms suggestive of infection, including 2 or more of the following signs occurring within the 3 weeks after hysteroscopy: fever; lower abdominal pain; uterine, adnexal, or cervical motion tenderness; purulent leukorrhea; vaginal discharge or itchiness; and dysuria. Vaginal culture, clinical evaluation, transvaginal ultrasound, and histological evaluation were completed to evaluate symptoms. Measurements and Main Results: Operative hysteroscopies comprised polypectomies (n = 7125; 82.0%), metroplasty (n = 731; 15.0%), myomectomy (n = 378; 7.8%), and tubal sterilization (n = 194; 4.0%). Twenty-five of the 42,934 patients (0.06%) exhibited symptoms of infection, including 24 patients (96%) with fever, 11 (45.8%) with fever as a single symptom, 7 (29.2%) with fever with pelvic pain, and 10 (41.7%) with fever with dysuria. In 5 patients with fever and pelvic pain, clinical examination and transvaginal ultrasound revealed monolateral or bilateral tubo-ovarian abscess. In these patients, histological examination from surgical specimens revealed the presence of endometriotic lesions. Conclusion: The present study suggests that routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary before hysteroscopy because the prevalence of infections following in-office hysteroscopy is low (0.06%).

Florio P, Nappi L, Mannini L, Pontrelli G, Fimiani R, Casadio P, et al. (2019). Prevalence of Infections After In-Office Hysteroscopy in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 26(4), 733-739 [10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.021].

Prevalence of Infections After In-Office Hysteroscopy in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women

Casadio P;
2019

Abstract

Study Objective: To estimate the incidence of infection after diagnostic and operative hysteroscopic procedures performed in an in-office setting with different distension media (saline solution or CO 2 ). Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: Tertiary women's health centers. Patients: A total of 42,934 women who underwent hysteroscopy between 2015 and 2017. Interventions: Of the 42,934 patients evaluated, 34,248 underwent a diagnostic intervention and 8686 underwent an operative intervention; 17,973 procedures used CO 2 and 24,961 used saline solution as a distension medium. Patients were contacted after the procedure to record postprocedure symptoms suggestive of infection, including 2 or more of the following signs occurring within the 3 weeks after hysteroscopy: fever; lower abdominal pain; uterine, adnexal, or cervical motion tenderness; purulent leukorrhea; vaginal discharge or itchiness; and dysuria. Vaginal culture, clinical evaluation, transvaginal ultrasound, and histological evaluation were completed to evaluate symptoms. Measurements and Main Results: Operative hysteroscopies comprised polypectomies (n = 7125; 82.0%), metroplasty (n = 731; 15.0%), myomectomy (n = 378; 7.8%), and tubal sterilization (n = 194; 4.0%). Twenty-five of the 42,934 patients (0.06%) exhibited symptoms of infection, including 24 patients (96%) with fever, 11 (45.8%) with fever as a single symptom, 7 (29.2%) with fever with pelvic pain, and 10 (41.7%) with fever with dysuria. In 5 patients with fever and pelvic pain, clinical examination and transvaginal ultrasound revealed monolateral or bilateral tubo-ovarian abscess. In these patients, histological examination from surgical specimens revealed the presence of endometriotic lesions. Conclusion: The present study suggests that routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary before hysteroscopy because the prevalence of infections following in-office hysteroscopy is low (0.06%).
2019
Florio P, Nappi L, Mannini L, Pontrelli G, Fimiani R, Casadio P, et al. (2019). Prevalence of Infections After In-Office Hysteroscopy in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 26(4), 733-739 [10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.021].
Florio P; Nappi L; Mannini L; Pontrelli G; Fimiani R; Casadio P; Mazzon I; Gonzales G; Villani V; Franchini M; Gubbini G; Mereu L; Santangelo F; Di Sp...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/948984
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact