Kundt's tube and reverberant chamber are common methods for determining the sound absorption coefficient or acoustic impedance of materials. These measurement methodologies are well-known and standardized, albeit not being practicable in-situ and requiring the isolation of samples of the material under test. Furthermore, Kundt’s tube results are affected by sample size, diameter, and length of the tube itself, while reverberant chamber ones by the room dimensions and diffusiveness. In literature, noncontact techniques for sound absorption coefficient and acoustic impedance measurement are widely debated. In this paper, three different noncontact systems for the measurement of the sound absorption coefficient have been investigated: a pressure-velocity probe, a Laser Doppler Vibrometer, and a spherical microphone array featuring 64 capsules. The three methods have been evaluated through in-situ measurements of materials with known acoustic characteristics: Basotect G+ and Expanded Polystyrene. Furthermore, the results obtained with the standard test signal, i.e., white noise, are compared with the exponential sine sweep technique, which provides an increased signal to noise ratio, and allows for removing nonlinear high order distortions and acoustic reflections. As a main contribution of this work, it will be shown that microphone arrays are an optimal solution for measuring the sound absorption coefficient.
Leonardo Saccenti, J.F. (2023). Noncontact Measurements of Sound Absorption Coefficient with a Pressure velocity Probe, a Laser Doppler Vibrometer, and a Microphone Array.
Noncontact Measurements of Sound Absorption Coefficient with a Pressure velocity Probe, a Laser Doppler Vibrometer, and a Microphone Array
Leonardo Saccenti
;
2023
Abstract
Kundt's tube and reverberant chamber are common methods for determining the sound absorption coefficient or acoustic impedance of materials. These measurement methodologies are well-known and standardized, albeit not being practicable in-situ and requiring the isolation of samples of the material under test. Furthermore, Kundt’s tube results are affected by sample size, diameter, and length of the tube itself, while reverberant chamber ones by the room dimensions and diffusiveness. In literature, noncontact techniques for sound absorption coefficient and acoustic impedance measurement are widely debated. In this paper, three different noncontact systems for the measurement of the sound absorption coefficient have been investigated: a pressure-velocity probe, a Laser Doppler Vibrometer, and a spherical microphone array featuring 64 capsules. The three methods have been evaluated through in-situ measurements of materials with known acoustic characteristics: Basotect G+ and Expanded Polystyrene. Furthermore, the results obtained with the standard test signal, i.e., white noise, are compared with the exponential sine sweep technique, which provides an increased signal to noise ratio, and allows for removing nonlinear high order distortions and acoustic reflections. As a main contribution of this work, it will be shown that microphone arrays are an optimal solution for measuring the sound absorption coefficient.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


