This article explores the relationship between texts and the scholarly categories to which they are attributed. In particular, it focuses on the Pratisakhyas-grammars of the linguistic features characterising Vedic recitation-and on the position they occupy within the domains of Sanskritic scholarship according to the different views expressed by their commentaries. In fact, the Pratisakhyas are variously presented as corresponding to specific canonical or non-canonical disciplines, or as piecing together parts of many disciplines. Because of the inherent stylistic difference between the Pratisakhyas and their commentaries, Vedic scholars found in the latter ones the (textual) space where they could express their opinions regarding the scholarly frame of reference to which the Pratisakhyas were said to belong.
Ciotti, G. (2018). On Texts and Disciplines: How the Pratisakhyas are Categorised by Their Commentaries. PHILOLOGICAL ENCOUNTERS, 3(3), 310-336 [10.1163/24519197-12340046].
On Texts and Disciplines: How the Pratisakhyas are Categorised by Their Commentaries
Ciotti, G
2018
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between texts and the scholarly categories to which they are attributed. In particular, it focuses on the Pratisakhyas-grammars of the linguistic features characterising Vedic recitation-and on the position they occupy within the domains of Sanskritic scholarship according to the different views expressed by their commentaries. In fact, the Pratisakhyas are variously presented as corresponding to specific canonical or non-canonical disciplines, or as piecing together parts of many disciplines. Because of the inherent stylistic difference between the Pratisakhyas and their commentaries, Vedic scholars found in the latter ones the (textual) space where they could express their opinions regarding the scholarly frame of reference to which the Pratisakhyas were said to belong.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.