BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of knowledge regarding the effects of different warm-up strategies not much is known about these effects and specific strategies with respect to basketball players.OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of different warm-up strategies on two specific functional actions of basketball, countermovement jump and speed.METHODS: Nineteen male basketball players aged between 19 and 27 (23.7 +/- 1.1 years) were recruited. Experimental sessions were conducted with a 24 h interval in-between. The athletes performed randomly the five warm-up conditions (aerobic + resistance training, aerobic + jumps, resistance training + jumps, jumps only, and control condition) followed by the physical tests (countermovement jump and a 20-m sprint).RESULTS: All warm-up conditions increased significantly the countermovement jump and sprint performance mainly for the jumps only condition for countermovement jump performance (p = 0.01) and resistance training + jumps for sprint performance (p = 0.01).CONCLUSION: Warm-up with jumps was the most effective method for increasing countermovement jump while resistance training + jumps was the best strategy to enhance 20 m speed performance.
Fortes, L.D., Paes, P.P., Mortatti, A.L., Perez, A.J., Cyrino, E.S., de Lima-Junior, D., et al. (2018). Effect of different warm-up strategies on countermovement jump and sprint performance in basketball players. ISOKINETICS AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 26(3), 219-225 [10.3233/IES-173142].
Effect of different warm-up strategies on countermovement jump and sprint performance in basketball players
de Lima-Junior, Dalton;
2018
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of knowledge regarding the effects of different warm-up strategies not much is known about these effects and specific strategies with respect to basketball players.OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of different warm-up strategies on two specific functional actions of basketball, countermovement jump and speed.METHODS: Nineteen male basketball players aged between 19 and 27 (23.7 +/- 1.1 years) were recruited. Experimental sessions were conducted with a 24 h interval in-between. The athletes performed randomly the five warm-up conditions (aerobic + resistance training, aerobic + jumps, resistance training + jumps, jumps only, and control condition) followed by the physical tests (countermovement jump and a 20-m sprint).RESULTS: All warm-up conditions increased significantly the countermovement jump and sprint performance mainly for the jumps only condition for countermovement jump performance (p = 0.01) and resistance training + jumps for sprint performance (p = 0.01).CONCLUSION: Warm-up with jumps was the most effective method for increasing countermovement jump while resistance training + jumps was the best strategy to enhance 20 m speed performance.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
