This article re-analyses the text of the so-called ‘Abydos tariπ’ in the edition given by Durliat and Guillou in 1984. It argues for a new dating to 498 or 500 and a new punctuation of the expression ὑπὲρ πρόβας (l. 27). These proposals, if accepted, entail two consequences : (1) that the edict was put back into force twenty-two years after its first publication by referring to the copper follis, which had changed from being a coin of account worth ½ of a carat (in 476/478), to a real coin worth 40 nummi (in 498/500) ; (2) the required gratuities ὑπὲρ πρόβας refer only to Cilician wine merchants and grain carriers, not to the other nauklēroi who traded in non-Cilician wine, oil, legumes and lard. From a broader historical perspective, the analysis proposed in the article tends to deny that the Abydos tariπ refers exclusively to goods transported to Constantinople as part of the navicularia functio

Cosentino, S. (2022). Nota sul tariffario di Abydos (498 oppure 500). OCCIDENTE ORIENTE, 3, 123-131 [10.19272/202214901006].

Nota sul tariffario di Abydos (498 oppure 500)

Salvatore Cosentino
2022

Abstract

This article re-analyses the text of the so-called ‘Abydos tariπ’ in the edition given by Durliat and Guillou in 1984. It argues for a new dating to 498 or 500 and a new punctuation of the expression ὑπὲρ πρόβας (l. 27). These proposals, if accepted, entail two consequences : (1) that the edict was put back into force twenty-two years after its first publication by referring to the copper follis, which had changed from being a coin of account worth ½ of a carat (in 476/478), to a real coin worth 40 nummi (in 498/500) ; (2) the required gratuities ὑπὲρ πρόβας refer only to Cilician wine merchants and grain carriers, not to the other nauklēroi who traded in non-Cilician wine, oil, legumes and lard. From a broader historical perspective, the analysis proposed in the article tends to deny that the Abydos tariπ refers exclusively to goods transported to Constantinople as part of the navicularia functio
2022
Cosentino, S. (2022). Nota sul tariffario di Abydos (498 oppure 500). OCCIDENTE ORIENTE, 3, 123-131 [10.19272/202214901006].
Cosentino, Salvatore
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/941278
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact