Meta-solver approaches exploit many individual solvers to potentially build a better solver. To assess the performance of meta-solvers, one can adopt the metrics typically used for individual solvers (e.g., runtime or solution quality) or employ more specific evaluation metrics (e.g., by measuring how close the meta-solver gets to its virtual best performance). In this paper, based on some recently published works, we provide an overview of different performance metrics for evaluating (meta-)solvers by exposing their strengths and weaknesses.

On the Evaluation of (Meta-)solver Approaches

Roberto Amadini
;
Maurizio Gabbrielli;Tong Liu;Jacopo Mauro
2023

Abstract

Meta-solver approaches exploit many individual solvers to potentially build a better solver. To assess the performance of meta-solvers, one can adopt the metrics typically used for individual solvers (e.g., runtime or solution quality) or employ more specific evaluation metrics (e.g., by measuring how close the meta-solver gets to its virtual best performance). In this paper, based on some recently published works, we provide an overview of different performance metrics for evaluating (meta-)solvers by exposing their strengths and weaknesses.
2023
Roberto Amadini; Maurizio Gabbrielli; Tong Liu; Jacopo Mauro
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
14102wPg#s.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 859.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
859.53 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/939654
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact