Here, we describe and discuss a method based on microscopical field of view (FOV) area to estimate diatom absolute abundances (densities or concentrations), and we statistically verify its reliability, also comparing it to another commonly used method (microspheres). To test the new method, we purposely performed replicate counts, both with the FOV and with the microsphere method, on both subfossil and recent material (samples) from mires. Intraclass correlation (ICC) revealed a high degree of agreement between the measurements obtained for the replicates with each of the two methods, suggesting that both are reliable for measuring diatom valve concentrations. However, the FOV consistently overestimated diatom absolute abundances, as compared to the microsphere method, and the ICC value used to assess the reliability of the two methods combined suggested that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. The FOV method is relatively simple, has a lower cost, wider applicability, higher resolution, and warrants compatibility with existing datasets. However, there may also be drawbacks, such as the potential for sample distortion during the concentration process. Therefore, it is important to carefully evaluate the strengths and limitations of the different methods before adopting one for specific research or applied questions.
Cantonati M., Cid-Rodríguez M., Rossi F., Leira M. (2023). A Simple and Inexpensive Method to Gain Diatom Absolute Abundances from Permanent Mounts in Hydrobiological and Paleoecological Research. APPLIED SCIENCES, 13, 1-9 [10.3390/app13106019].
A Simple and Inexpensive Method to Gain Diatom Absolute Abundances from Permanent Mounts in Hydrobiological and Paleoecological Research
Cantonati M.
Primo
;
2023
Abstract
Here, we describe and discuss a method based on microscopical field of view (FOV) area to estimate diatom absolute abundances (densities or concentrations), and we statistically verify its reliability, also comparing it to another commonly used method (microspheres). To test the new method, we purposely performed replicate counts, both with the FOV and with the microsphere method, on both subfossil and recent material (samples) from mires. Intraclass correlation (ICC) revealed a high degree of agreement between the measurements obtained for the replicates with each of the two methods, suggesting that both are reliable for measuring diatom valve concentrations. However, the FOV consistently overestimated diatom absolute abundances, as compared to the microsphere method, and the ICC value used to assess the reliability of the two methods combined suggested that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. The FOV method is relatively simple, has a lower cost, wider applicability, higher resolution, and warrants compatibility with existing datasets. However, there may also be drawbacks, such as the potential for sample distortion during the concentration process. Therefore, it is important to carefully evaluate the strengths and limitations of the different methods before adopting one for specific research or applied questions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Cantonati-etal-2023_FOV-method-absol-abund-diatom-perm-mounts_ApplSci-13-06019-v2.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
561.59 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
561.59 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.