Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual's recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Google Scholar. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA)" for scoping review was followed. Results: Seventeen articles regarding total rhinectomy reconstruction were finally identified in the English literature, with a total of 447 cases. The prostheses were the reconstructive choice in 213 (47.7%) patients, followed by local flaps in 172 (38.5%) and free flaps in 62 (13.8%). The forehead flap (FF) and the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) are the most frequently used flaps. Conclusions: This study shows that both prosthetic and surgical reconstruction are very suitable solutions in terms of surgical and aesthetic outcomes for the patient.

Migliorelli A., Sgarzani R., Cammaroto G., De Vito A., Gessaroli M., Manuelli M., et al. (2023). Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art. HEALTHCARE, 11(12), 1-10 [10.3390/healthcare11121785].

Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art

Sgarzani R.
Secondo
Conceptualization
;
De Vito A.;Gessaroli M.;
2023

Abstract

Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual's recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Google Scholar. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA)" for scoping review was followed. Results: Seventeen articles regarding total rhinectomy reconstruction were finally identified in the English literature, with a total of 447 cases. The prostheses were the reconstructive choice in 213 (47.7%) patients, followed by local flaps in 172 (38.5%) and free flaps in 62 (13.8%). The forehead flap (FF) and the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) are the most frequently used flaps. Conclusions: This study shows that both prosthetic and surgical reconstruction are very suitable solutions in terms of surgical and aesthetic outcomes for the patient.
2023
Migliorelli A., Sgarzani R., Cammaroto G., De Vito A., Gessaroli M., Manuelli M., et al. (2023). Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art. HEALTHCARE, 11(12), 1-10 [10.3390/healthcare11121785].
Migliorelli A.; Sgarzani R.; Cammaroto G.; De Vito A.; Gessaroli M.; Manuelli M.; Ciorba A.; Bianchini C.; Pelucchi S.; Meccariello G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
healthcare-11-01785.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 566.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
566.63 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/936104
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact