Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual's recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Google Scholar. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA)" for scoping review was followed. Results: Seventeen articles regarding total rhinectomy reconstruction were finally identified in the English literature, with a total of 447 cases. The prostheses were the reconstructive choice in 213 (47.7%) patients, followed by local flaps in 172 (38.5%) and free flaps in 62 (13.8%). The forehead flap (FF) and the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) are the most frequently used flaps. Conclusions: This study shows that both prosthetic and surgical reconstruction are very suitable solutions in terms of surgical and aesthetic outcomes for the patient.

Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art / Migliorelli A.; Sgarzani R.; Cammaroto G.; De Vito A.; Gessaroli M.; Manuelli M.; Ciorba A.; Bianchini C.; Pelucchi S.; Meccariello G.. - In: HEALTHCARE. - ISSN 2227-9032. - ELETTRONICO. - 11:12(2023), pp. 1785.1-1785.10. [10.3390/healthcare11121785]

Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art

Sgarzani R.
Secondo
Conceptualization
;
De Vito A.;Gessaroli M.;
2023

Abstract

Background: The nose is a central component of the face, and it is fundamental to an individual's recognition and attractiveness. The aim of this study is to present a review of the last twenty years literature on reconstructive techniques after oncological rhinectomy. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Google Scholar. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA)" for scoping review was followed. Results: Seventeen articles regarding total rhinectomy reconstruction were finally identified in the English literature, with a total of 447 cases. The prostheses were the reconstructive choice in 213 (47.7%) patients, followed by local flaps in 172 (38.5%) and free flaps in 62 (13.8%). The forehead flap (FF) and the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) are the most frequently used flaps. Conclusions: This study shows that both prosthetic and surgical reconstruction are very suitable solutions in terms of surgical and aesthetic outcomes for the patient.
2023
Reconstructive Options after Oncological Rhinectomy: State of the Art / Migliorelli A.; Sgarzani R.; Cammaroto G.; De Vito A.; Gessaroli M.; Manuelli M.; Ciorba A.; Bianchini C.; Pelucchi S.; Meccariello G.. - In: HEALTHCARE. - ISSN 2227-9032. - ELETTRONICO. - 11:12(2023), pp. 1785.1-1785.10. [10.3390/healthcare11121785]
Migliorelli A.; Sgarzani R.; Cammaroto G.; De Vito A.; Gessaroli M.; Manuelli M.; Ciorba A.; Bianchini C.; Pelucchi S.; Meccariello G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
healthcare-11-01785.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 566.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
566.63 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/936104
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact