Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has made extensive use of the originalist canon to overrule two historical Supreme Court precedents recognizing the right to abortion. The article analyzes its arguments, highlighting their contradictions and criticizing the general conception of the Constitution sketched by the decision
Corrado Caruso (2023). Originalismo e teoria della Costituzione. Una critica a Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. BIOLAW JOURNAL, 1/2023(Special Issue), 87-103 [10.15168/2284-4503-2560].
Originalismo e teoria della Costituzione. Una critica a Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Corrado Caruso
2023
Abstract
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has made extensive use of the originalist canon to overrule two historical Supreme Court precedents recognizing the right to abortion. The article analyzes its arguments, highlighting their contradictions and criticizing the general conception of the Constitution sketched by the decisionFile in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
dobbs biolaw journal.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione
4.87 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.87 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
