Purpose Insecure and unresolved attachment have been linked to poorer psychological health and interpersonal functioning for people with ID, but research in this area is limited, especially for adults. Studies using the Adult Attachment Projective (AAP) have been restricted to clinical samples, where insecure and unresolved attachment are typically more prevalent. We compare clinical and non-clinical groups of adults with ID on the AAP, plus measures of psychological health and interpersonal functioning, to investigate whether group differences found in the typically developing population are also present for adults with ID. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional, between-group design was employed. Adults with ID (clinical group n = 11, non- clinical group n = 13) completed measures of attachment, psychological distress/positive well-being, and interpersonal functioning. Attachment classifications were compared in the clinical vs non-clinical groups. Measures of psychological distress, positive well-being and interpersonal functioning were compared between those with insecure-organised vs unresolved classifications. Findings No participants were classified as secure, and there were high rates of unresolved attachment. There were no differences between clinical and non-clinical groups with regards to the distribution of insecure-organised (i.e. dismissing or preoccupied) versus unresolved classifications. There were no differences between groups with regards to psychological distress, positive well-being or interpersonal functioning. We consider limitations in the method of group differentiation, and suggest further research to better understand the development of internal working models of attachment in this population. Originality This study is one of only three to examine attachment state of mind in adults with ID using the AAP, and the first to examine differences between clinical and non-clinical groups.
Lucy Bateman, A.F. (2023). Attachment, Psychological Health and Interpersonal Functioning: A Comparison of Clinical and Non-clinical Groups of People with Intellectual Disability. ADVANCES IN MENTAL HEALTH AND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2023, 1-27 [10.1108/AMHID-04-2023-0011].
Attachment, Psychological Health and Interpersonal Functioning: A Comparison of Clinical and Non-clinical Groups of People with Intellectual Disability
Leonardo De Pascalis
2023
Abstract
Purpose Insecure and unresolved attachment have been linked to poorer psychological health and interpersonal functioning for people with ID, but research in this area is limited, especially for adults. Studies using the Adult Attachment Projective (AAP) have been restricted to clinical samples, where insecure and unresolved attachment are typically more prevalent. We compare clinical and non-clinical groups of adults with ID on the AAP, plus measures of psychological health and interpersonal functioning, to investigate whether group differences found in the typically developing population are also present for adults with ID. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional, between-group design was employed. Adults with ID (clinical group n = 11, non- clinical group n = 13) completed measures of attachment, psychological distress/positive well-being, and interpersonal functioning. Attachment classifications were compared in the clinical vs non-clinical groups. Measures of psychological distress, positive well-being and interpersonal functioning were compared between those with insecure-organised vs unresolved classifications. Findings No participants were classified as secure, and there were high rates of unresolved attachment. There were no differences between clinical and non-clinical groups with regards to the distribution of insecure-organised (i.e. dismissing or preoccupied) versus unresolved classifications. There were no differences between groups with regards to psychological distress, positive well-being or interpersonal functioning. We consider limitations in the method of group differentiation, and suggest further research to better understand the development of internal working models of attachment in this population. Originality This study is one of only three to examine attachment state of mind in adults with ID using the AAP, and the first to examine differences between clinical and non-clinical groups.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
AMHID submission revision 19 April FINAL.docx
accesso riservato
Tipo:
Preprint
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione
80.57 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
80.57 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri Contatta l'autore |
DePascalis_AMHID+submission+revision+19+April+FINAL_AM_copertina_immagini.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Postprint
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non opere derivate (CCBYND)
Dimensione
1.41 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.41 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.