Multi-sector variants of gravity models typically predict much larger gains from trade (losses from protectionism) than their one-sector counterparts. This result –corroborated by several model-based quantification studies and commonly ascribed to Jensen’s inequality– has been recently questioned by studies that use micro price data to obtain sector-level estimates of the trade elasticity, a key parameter for the quantification of the gains. We reassess this issue by using a novel set of estimates of the trade elasticity at various levels of sectoral disaggregation, exploiting a recently proposed identification strategy based on tariffs. In our baseline 24-sector model specification, we find that the cross-country average size of the gains amounts to 12% and that this number is 21% larger than the one delivered by the one-sector specification. Overall, our results suggest that the effects of magnification of the gains associated with greater sectoral disaggregation (which we confirm to be mainly driven by cross-sector variation in trade elasticity) are significant, not negligible, but considerably smaller than generally quantified in the previous literature.

Gains from trade and their quantification: Does sectoral disaggregation matter?

Bolatto, Stefano
;
Moramarco, Graziano
2023

Abstract

Multi-sector variants of gravity models typically predict much larger gains from trade (losses from protectionism) than their one-sector counterparts. This result –corroborated by several model-based quantification studies and commonly ascribed to Jensen’s inequality– has been recently questioned by studies that use micro price data to obtain sector-level estimates of the trade elasticity, a key parameter for the quantification of the gains. We reassess this issue by using a novel set of estimates of the trade elasticity at various levels of sectoral disaggregation, exploiting a recently proposed identification strategy based on tariffs. In our baseline 24-sector model specification, we find that the cross-country average size of the gains amounts to 12% and that this number is 21% larger than the one delivered by the one-sector specification. Overall, our results suggest that the effects of magnification of the gains associated with greater sectoral disaggregation (which we confirm to be mainly driven by cross-sector variation in trade elasticity) are significant, not negligible, but considerably smaller than generally quantified in the previous literature.
2023
Bolatto, Stefano; Moramarco, Graziano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gains_from_Trade.pdf

embargo fino al 17/03/2025

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 671.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
671.59 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/921771
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact