Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has made extensive use of the originalist canon to overrule two historical Supreme Court precedents recognizing the right to abortion. The article analyzes its arguments, highlighting their contradictions and criticizing the general conception of the Constitution sketched by the decision.
La Costituzione di Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Un’analisi critica / Corrado Caruso. - In: LO STATO. - ISSN 2283-6527. - STAMPA. - 19:(2022), pp. 207-226.
La Costituzione di Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Un’analisi critica
Corrado Caruso
2022
Abstract
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has made extensive use of the originalist canon to overrule two historical Supreme Court precedents recognizing the right to abortion. The article analyzes its arguments, highlighting their contradictions and criticizing the general conception of the Constitution sketched by the decision.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
La Costituzione di Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Un’analisi critica.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione
2.78 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.78 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
