Corrigendum to “Central positions and performance in the scientific community. Evidences from clinical research projects” [J. Bus. Res. 68(5) (2015) 1074–1081] (Journal of Business Research (2015) 68(5) (1074–1081), (S0148296314003397), (10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.009))

Corrigendum text: Authors would like to correct an imprecise definition, with respect to the variables used in the paper. On page 1077, column 2, second paragraph, the definition of closeness centrality should read as: “Closeness centrality is the reciprocal of farness (Bavelas, 1950) and indicates how “close” a node is to all the other nodes within the network.” And not as reported in the article: “Closeness centrality is based upon “the frequency with which a point falls between pairs of other points on the shortest or geodesic paths connecting them” (Freeman, 1979).” While this has no effect on the article development, hypotheses or analyses, which are all based on the idea and measure of closeness centrality, the sentence wrongly reports the definition of betweenness centrality (Freeman, 1979).