This article reconsiders the issue of Petrarch's reception of Lucan's political views. Its contention is that Petrarch does not regard Lucan as a fiercely anti-Cesar author, as scholars have often assumed, but rather as the poet of both Caesar and Pompey and as a narrator who is able to highlight the different standpoints, virtues, and shortcomings of the two opposing commanders. In his works, Petrarch exploits the ambiguities that he already finds in Lucan's text to produce ambivalent representations of both Caesar and Pompey. At the same time, Petrarch substantially re-adapts the "Bellum Civile" from a Christian perspective: he extols Lucan's heroes as models of fortitude, and yet in so doing shows the intrinsic inferiority of pagan heroism to Christian virtus.
Facchini B (2018). Petrarch's Lucan and the Ambiguities of Ancient Heroism. HUMANISTICA, 13, 81-116.
Petrarch's Lucan and the Ambiguities of Ancient Heroism
Facchini B
2018
Abstract
This article reconsiders the issue of Petrarch's reception of Lucan's political views. Its contention is that Petrarch does not regard Lucan as a fiercely anti-Cesar author, as scholars have often assumed, but rather as the poet of both Caesar and Pompey and as a narrator who is able to highlight the different standpoints, virtues, and shortcomings of the two opposing commanders. In his works, Petrarch exploits the ambiguities that he already finds in Lucan's text to produce ambivalent representations of both Caesar and Pompey. At the same time, Petrarch substantially re-adapts the "Bellum Civile" from a Christian perspective: he extols Lucan's heroes as models of fortitude, and yet in so doing shows the intrinsic inferiority of pagan heroism to Christian virtus.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


